annastacia palaszczuk, approval, daniel andrews, dominic perrottet, gladys berejiklian, mark mcgowan, New South Wales, NSW, Performance, SA, south australia, state premier, steven marshall, VIC, Victoria, WA, Western Australia
Q. Do you approve or disapprove of the job <NAME> is doing as State Premier?
[Only asked in NSW, VIC, QLD, SA and WA]
| TOTAL: Approve | 25/10/21 | 16/11/20 | 02/11/20 | 19/10/20 |
| [Prior to Oct’21] Gladys Berejiklian
[Oct’21 onwards] Dominic Perrottet NSW |
47% | 75% | 68% | 67% |
| Daniel Andrews
VIC |
52% | 65% | 61% | 54% |
| Annastacia Palaszczuk
QLD |
66% | 65% | 65% | 62% |
| Steven Marshall
SA |
61% | 60% | 71% | 51% |
| Mark McGowan
WA |
82% | 87% | 78% | 84% |
| Base (n) | 1,781 | 1,036 | 1,063 | 1,082 |
|
|
Dominic Perrottet NSW | Daniel Andrews
VIC |
Annastacia Palaszczuk
QLD |
Steven Marshall
SA |
Mark McGowan
WA |
| Strongly approve | 9% | 20% | 26% | 15% | 46% |
| Approve | 38% | 32% | 40% | 46% | 36% |
| Disapprove | 17% | 16% | 12% | 18% | 8% |
| Strongly disapprove | 11% | 24% | 15% | 8% | 5% |
| Don’t know | 25% | 9% | 7% | 13% | 5% |
| TOTAL: Approve | 47% | 52% | 66% | 61% | 82% |
| TOTAL: Disapprove | 28% | 40% | 27% | 27% | 13% |
| Base (n) | 352 | 275 | 217 | 443 | 441 |
dominic perrotet, immigration, NSW, premier
Q. The NSW Premier Dominic Perrottet recently called for an increase in Australia’s immigration levels.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
| TOTAL:
Agree |
TOTAL:
Disagree |
Strongly agree | Somewhat agree | Neither agree nor disagree | Somewhat disagree | Strongly disagree | |
| Increasing immigration levels would add more pressure on the housing system and infrastructure | 63% | 11% | 31% | 32% | 25% | 8% | 4% |
| Immigration is vital for Australia’s business and economy | 51% | 20% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 11% | 9% |
| Increasing immigration levels would equip businesses with the skilled workers they need to reopen as Covid-19 restrictions are eased | 50% | 22% | 16% | 33% | 28% | 13% | 9% |
| Increasing immigration levels would help to address Australia’s growing skills shortages as the population ages | 49% | 22% | 14% | 35% | 29% | 13% | 9% |
| Increasing immigration levels would create more competition for jobs and slow wage growth | 48% | 21% | 18% | 30% | 31% | 13% | 7% |
| TOTAL: Agree | Total | Gender | Age Group | Federal Voting Intention | ||||||
| Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-54 | 55+ | Labor | TOTAL: Coalition | Greens | TOTAL: Other | ||
| Increasing immigration levels would add more pressure on the housing system and infrastructure | 63% | 62% | 64% | 54% | 65% | 70% | 66% | 65% | 59% | 64% |
| Immigration is vital for Australia’s business and economy | 51% | 54% | 48% | 53% | 50% | 50% | 56% | 54% | 60% | 39% |
| Increasing immigration levels would equip businesses with the skilled workers they need to reopen as Covid-19 restrictions are eased | 50% | 52% | 47% | 50% | 47% | 51% | 54% | 52% | 56% | 42% |
| Increasing immigration levels would help to address Australia’s growing skills shortages as the population ages | 49% | 51% | 46% | 48% | 46% | 52% | 53% | 51% | 57% | 39% |
| Increasing immigration levels would create more competition for jobs and slow wage growth | 48% | 51% | 45% | 50% | 50% | 46% | 51% | 48% | 45% | 51% |
| Base (n) | 1,781 | 875 | 906 | 533 | 601 | 647 | 636 | 610 | 157 | 220 |
| TOTAL: Agree | People who say the levels of immigration have been
too low |
People who say the levels of immigration have been
about right |
People who say the levels of immigration have been
too high |
| Increasing immigration levels would add more pressure on the housing system and infrastructure | 47% | 62% | 76% |
| Immigration is vital for Australia’s business and economy | 74% | 60% | 34% |
| Increasing immigration levels would equip businesses with the skilled workers they need to reopen as Covid-19 restrictions are eased | 77% | 58% | 34% |
| Increasing immigration levels would help to address Australia’s growing skills shortages as the population ages | 75% | 56% | 34% |
| Increasing immigration levels would create more competition for jobs and slow wage growth | 47% | 48% | 53% |
| Base (n) | 277 | 645 | 694 |
Q. How long do you think it will take for the following to occur in NSW?
| This week
19/07 |
Two weeks up to one month | One month up to six months | Seven months up to one year | One to two years | More than two years | Never |
| The Covid-19 outbreak in NSW is controlled | 46% | 33% | 10% | 5% | 2% | 4% |
| The lockdown in Greater Sydney is lifted | 62% | 28% | 5% | 2% | 0% | 2% |
| The lockdown in other affected areas in NSW is lifted (e.g. Blue Mountains, Central Coast, Wollongong and Shellharbour) | 71% | 20% | 4% | 2% | 1% | 3% |
| NSW | Two weeks up to one month | |
| 19/07 | 05/07 | |
| The Covid-19 outbreak in NSW is controlled | 47% | 50% |
| The lockdown in Greater Sydney is lifted | 62% | 76% |
| The lockdown in other affected areas in NSW is lifted (e.g. Blue Mountains, Central Coast, Wollongong and Shellharbour) | 69% | 77% |
| Base (n) | 354 | 553 |
Q. Overall, do you think NSW moved too quickly, too slowly or at about the right speed in terms of enforcing lockdown restrictions?
[ASKED TO RESPONDENTS IN NSW ONLY]
| Total | Gender | Age Group | Federal Voting Intention | |||||||
| Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-54 | 55+ | Labor | TOTAL: Coalition | Greens | TOTAL: Other | ||
| Moved too quickly | 10% | 9% | 11% | 14% | 9% | 7% | 9% | 8% | 9% | 21% |
| About the right speed | 51% | 50% | 51% | 51% | 50% | 51% | 41% | 62% | 49% | 44% |
| Moved too slowly | 39% | 41% | 38% | 35% | 41% | 41% | 50% | 30% | 43% | 35% |
| Base (n) | 553 | 268 | 285 | 147 | 203 | 203 | 182 | 226 | 41 | 44 |
Q. How long do you think it will take for the following to occur in NSW?
[ASKED TO RESPONDENTS IN NSW ONLY]
| Two weeks up to one month | One month up to six months | Seven months up to one year | One to two years | More than two years | Never | |
| The Covid-19 outbreak in NSW is controlled | 50% | 18% | 7% | 10% | 7% | 7% |
| The lockdown in Greater Sydney is lifted | 76% | 13% | 5% | 3% | 2% | 2% |
| The lockdown in other affected areas in NSW is lifted (e.g. Blue Mountains, Central Coast, Wollongong and Shellharbour) | 77% | 11% | 4% | 3% | 2% | 2% |
| Interstate travel will be allowed without restriction | 38% | 26% | 12% | 11% | 8% | 5% |
| Quarantine will no longer be required after interstate travel | 32% | 20% | 13% | 15% | 12% | 7% |
| The Covid-19 vaccine rollout will be completed in NSW | 14% | 14% | 28% | 24% | 12% | 8% |
NSW, QLD, SA, State Premiers, VIC, WA
Q. Do you approve or disapprove of the job <NAME> is doing as State Premier?
[Only asked in NSW, VIC, QLD, SA and WA]
|
|
Gladys Berejiklian
NSW |
Daniel Andrews
VIC |
Annastacia Palaszczuk
QLD |
Mark McGowan
WA |
| Strongly approve | 28% | 29% | 28% | 45% |
| Approve | 40% | 31% | 37% | 33% |
| Disapprove | 13% | 15% | 16% | 6% |
| Strongly disapprove | 8% | 18% | 8% | 7% |
| Don’t know | 11% | 6% | 11% | 10% |
| TOTAL: Approve | 68% | 61% | 65% | 78% |
| TOTAL: Disapprove | 21% | 33% | 24% | 12% |
| Base (n) | 345 | 275 | 209 | 102 |
| RESULTS FROM 19/10/20
|
Gladys Berejiklian
NSW |
Daniel Andrews
VIC |
Annastacia Palaszczuk
QLD |
Mark McGowan
WA |
| Strongly approve | 27% | 25% | 23% | 53% |
| Approve | 41% | 29% | 39% | 31% |
| Disapprove | 14% | 16% | 12% | 6% |
| Strongly disapprove | 9% | 24% | 15% | 1% |
| Don’t know | 11% | 6% | 10% | 10% |
| TOTAL: Approve | 67% | 54% | 62% | 84% |
| TOTAL: Disapprove | 22% | 40% | 28% | 7% |
| Base (n) | 352 | 274 | 217 | 105 |
11 June 2013, 110613, NSW, Pauline Hanson, State Election
Q. Pauline Hanson has announced she will run for the Senate in New South Wales in the next Federal election. How likely would Pauline Hanson be to make a positive contribution to Federal Parliament?
|
Total |
|
Vote Labor |
Vote Lib/Nat |
Vote Greens |
|
Julian Assange Apr 13 |
|
| Total likely |
30% |
27% |
34% |
13% |
32% |
||
| Total not likely |
58% |
62% |
58% |
78% |
50% |
||
| Very likely |
10% |
7% |
10% |
4% |
12% |
||
| Somewhat likely |
20% |
20% |
24% |
9% |
20% |
||
| Not very likely |
20% |
17% |
24% |
23% |
25% |
||
| Not at all likely |
38% |
45% |
34% |
55% |
25% |
||
| Don’t know |
12% |
11% |
8% |
8% |
17% |
30% think it is very or somewhat likely that Pauline Hanson would make a positive contribution if elected to Federal Parliament and 58% think it is not very or not at all likely. Those most likely to think she would make a positive contribution were Liberal/National voters (34%), voters for other parties or independents (48%) and those on incomes less than $600pw (38%).
When a similar question was asked about Julian Assange in April, 32% thought it likely he would make a positive contribution and 50% thought it not likely.
2PP, EMC, ER, Essential Media, Essential Report, Greens, Independent, Labor, Liberal, NSW, NSW 2PP, NSW Election, NSW vote, NSW voting intention, Polling, polls, Voting intention
Q. If a State Election was held today to which party will you probably give your first preference vote? If not sure, which party are you currently leaning toward?
Q. If don’t know -Well which party are you currently leaning to?
| First preference /leaning to | Total | Men | Women | Sydney | Other NSW | Aged 18-34 | Aged 35-54 | Aged 55+ |
| Sample | 971 | 481 | 490 | 622 | 349 | 309 | 391 | 271 |
| Labor | 23% | 23% | 24% | 20% | 29% | 21% | 24% | 25% |
| Liberal/National | 55% | 56% | 53% | 60% | 46% | 55% | 54% | 55% |
| Greens | 11% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 10% | 14% | 9% | 9% |
| Independent/Other | 11% | 10% | 12% | 10% | 15% | 10% | 13% | 11% |
| 2PP | ||||||||
| Labor | 34% | 33% | 35% | 29% | 42% | 32% | 35% | 34% |
| Liberal/National | 66% | 67% | 65% | 71% | 58% | 68% | 65% | 66% |
NB. The data in the above tables comprise 3-week averages derived the first preference/leaning to voting questions. Respondents who select ‘don’t know’ are not included in the results. The two-party preferred estimate is calculated by separately distributing the votes of the Greens and the Independents/other parties according to their preferences at the previous election. This calculation excludes exhausted votes.