Essential Report
Download this week's Report
Coronavirus concerns
Q. To what extent are you concerned about the threat of Covid-19 (coronavirus) in Australia?
| 25/05 | 18/05 | 11/05 | 04/05 | 27/04 | 20/04 | 13/04 | 06/04 | 29/03 | 22/03 | 09/03 | |
| Very concerned | 30% | 33% | 34% | 32% | 39% | 44% | 45% | 51% | 53% | 39% | 27% |
| Quite concerned | 49% | 47% | 49% | 46% | 44% | 43% | 43% | 37% | 35% | 43% | 36% |
| Not that concerned | 16% | 16% | 14% | 18% | 13% | 11% | 9% | 10% | 10% | 14% | 28% |
| Not at all concerned | 5% | 4% | 3% | 4% | 3% | 2% | 3% | 2% | 3% | 4% | 9% |
| Base (n) | 1,087 | 1,073 | 1,067 | 1,093 | 1,054 | 1,051 | 1,068 | 1,069 | 1,086 | 1,034 | 1,096 |
| Age group | Location | |||||
| Total | 18-34 | 35-54 | 55+ | Capital | Non-Capital | |
| Very concerned | 30% | 29% | 33% | 28% | 32% | 26% |
| Quite concerned | 49% | 49% | 49% | 49% | 49% | 48% |
| Not that concerned | 16% | 18% | 14% | 17% | 15% | 20% |
| Not at all concerned | 5% | 4% | 4% | 6% | 4% | 7% |
| Base (n) | 1,087 | 341 | 364 | 382 | 738 | 349 |
Likelihood of developing Coronavirus
Q. How likely do you think it is, that you will develop Covid-19?
| 25/05 | 18/05 | 11/05 | 04/05 | 27/04 | 20/04 | 13/04 | 06/04 | 29/03 | 22/03 | |
| Very likely | 5% | 6% | 6% | 5% | 5% | 7% | 5% | 8% | 8% | 8% |
| Somewhat likely | 22% | 25% | 24% | 26% | 21% | 25% | 28% | 33% | 36% | 34% |
| Somewhat unlikely | 51% | 48% | 48% | 46% | 50% | 52% | 49% | 45% | 45% | 45% |
| Very unlikely | 23% | 21% | 21% | 23% | 23% | 17% | 18% | 14% | 12% | 13% |
| Base (n) | 1,087 | 1,073 | 1,067 | 1.093 | 1,054 | 1,051 | 1,068 | 1,069 | 1,086 | 1,034 |
| Age group | Location | |||||
| Total | 18-34 | 35-54 | 55+ | Capital | Non-Capital | |
| Very likely | 5% | 8% | 6% | 2% | 7% | 2% |
| Somewhat likely | 22% | 22% | 27% | 16% | 23% | 20% |
| Somewhat unlikely | 51% | 45% | 46% | 59% | 50% | 53% |
| Very unlikely | 23% | 25% | 21% | 23% | 21% | 25% |
| Base (n) | 1,087 | 341 | 364 | 382 | 738 | 349 |
Government response to Covid-19
Q. Overall, how would you rate the Government’s response to the Covid-19 outbreak?
| 25/05 | 18/05 | 11/05 | 04/05 | 27/04 | 20/04 | 13/04 | 06/04 | 29/03 | |
| Very poor | 4% | 3% | 4% | 4% | 4% | 5% | 6% | 6% | 11% |
| Quite poor | 6% | 7% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 10% | 12% | 15% | 21% |
| Neither good, nor poor | 16% | 17% | 16% | 20% | 17% | 21% | 20% | 21% | 24% |
| Quite good | 43% | 41% | 39% | 38% | 44% | 42% | 40% | 37% | 34% |
| Very good | 30% | 32% | 32% | 28% | 26% | 23% | 23% | 21% | 11% |
| TOTAL: Poor | 11% | 11% | 13% | 14% | 13% | 15% | 17% | 21% | 31% |
| TOTAL: Good | 73% | 73% | 71% | 66% | 70% | 65% | 63% | 58% | 45% |
| Base (n) | 1,087 | 1,073 | 1,067 | 1,093 | 1,054 | 1,051 | 1,068 | 1,069 | 1,086 |
| Gender | Age Group | Location | |||||||
| Total | Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-54 | 55+ | Capital | Non-Capital | ||
| Very poor | 4% | 6% | 3% | 7% | 4% | 3% | 4% | 6% | |
| Quite poor | 6% | 8% | 4% | 8% | 7% | 3% | 6% | 6% | |
| Neither good, nor poor | 16% | 16% | 16% | 21% | 16% | 13% | 16% | 18% | |
| Quite good | 43% | 41% | 44% | 48% | 47% | 34% | 45% | 38% | |
| Very good | 30% | 28% | 32% | 16% | 26% | 47% | 29% | 33% | |
| TOTAL: Poor | 11% | 14% | 7% | 15% | 11% | 6% | 10% | 12% | |
| TOTAL: Good | 73% | 70% | 76% | 63% | 73% | 81% | 74% | 70% | |
| Base (n) | 1,087 | 534 | 553 | 341 | 364 | 382 | 738 | 349 | |
State Government response to Covid-19
Q. How would you rate your state government’s response to the Covid-19 outbreak?
| 25/05 | 18/05 | 11/05 | 04/05 | 27/04 | 20/04 | 13/04 | |
| Very poor | 4% | 3% | 4% | 4% | 4% | 5% | 5% |
| Quite poor | 7% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 9% | 9% | 11% |
| Neither good, nor poor | 17% | 17% | 16% | 18% | 17% | 20% | 20% |
| Quite good | 38% | 39% | 39% | 38% | 41% | 39% | 38% |
| Very good | 35% | 33% | 34% | 31% | 30% | 26% | 26% |
| TOTAL: Poor | 11% | 11% | 12% | 12% | 13% | 14% | 16% |
| TOTAL: Good | 73% | 72% | 73% | 70% | 70% | 66% | 64% |
| Base (n) | 1,087 | 1,073 | 1,067 | 1,093 | 1,054 | 1,051 | 1,068 |
| State | |||||||
| Total | NSW | VIC | QLD | SA | WA | ||
| Very poor | 4% | 5% | 3% | 3% | 2% | 4% | |
| Quite poor | 7% | 8% | 9% | 8% | 2% | 3% | |
| Neither good, nor poor | 17% | 22% | 16% | 15% | 12% | 10% | |
| Quite good | 38% | 41% | 37% | 42% | 38% | 20% | |
| Very good | 35% | 24% | 36% | 32% | 46% | 63% | |
| TOTAL: Poor | 11% | 13% | 11% | 12% | 4% | 7% | |
| TOTAL: Good | 73% | 65% | 73% | 74% | 84% | 83% | |
| Base (n) | 1,087 | 349 | 275 | 220 | 84 | 106 | |
Easing restrictions
Q. When do you think governments should start to ease the restrictions on travel and gatherings to allow offices, shops, restaurants, other workplaces, and public spaces to start operating again?
| 25/05 | 18/05 | 11/05 | 04/05 | 27/04 | 20/04 | |
| As soon as possible | 14% | 9% | 13% | 10% | 10% | 9% |
| Within the next 1 to 2 weeks | 10% | 13% | 12% | 9% | 7% | 6% |
| Within the next month | 23% | 23% | 22% | 21% | 18% | 14% |
| By the end of next month | 17% | 22% | 20% | 15% | 15% | 13% |
| It is too soon to consider easing restrictions | 27% | 25% | 27% | 37% | 42% | 49% |
| Unsure | 9% | 8% | 6% | 8% | 8% | 10% |
| Base (n) | 1,087 | 1,073 | 1,067 | 1,093 | 1,054 | 1,051 |
| Gender | Age Group | ||||||
| Total | Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-54 | 55+ | ||
| As soon as possible | 14% | 18% | 10% | 17% | 12% | 14% | |
| Within the next 1 to 2 weeks | 10% | 11% | 10% | 12% | 9% | 10% | |
| Within the next month | 23% | 24% | 23% | 24% | 22% | 23% | |
| By the end of next month | 17% | 17% | 17% | 15% | 18% | 18% | |
| It is too soon to consider easing restrictions | 27% | 22% | 31% | 23% | 29% | 28% | |
| Unsure | 9% | 8% | 9% | 9% | 10% | 7% | |
| Base (n) | 1,087 | 534 | 553 | 341 | 364 | 382 | |
Continuation of short-term measures
Q. The Federal Government has introduced some short-term measures to help people financially deal with the Covid-19 outbreak. For each of the following, how long do you think do you think the schemes should continue?
| Should end as soon as possible | Should end at current set date | Should continue after the current end date | Unsure | |
| Providing free childcare for children in early childhood education
(Due to end 28th June 2020) |
14% | 33% | 36% | 17% |
| Increase to JobSeeker payments to $1,115 per fortnight
(Due to end 24th September 2020) |
21% | 28% | 36% | 15% |
| Provision of JobKeeper wage subsidy of $1,500 per fortnight to eligible employers for each eligible worker
(Due to end 24th September 2020) |
17% | 36% | 32% | 14% |
| TOTAL: Should continue after the current end date | Gender | Age Group | ||||
| Total | Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-54 | 55+ | |
| Providing free childcare for children in early childhood education | 36% | 39% | 33% | 43% | 34% | 31% |
| Increase to JobSeeker payments to $1,115 per fortnight | 36% | 39% | 33% | 42% | 36% | 30% |
| Provision of JobKeeper wage subsidy of $1,500 per fortnight to eligible employers for each eligible worker | 32% | 35% | 30% | 38% | 32% | 27% |
| Base (n) | 1,087 | 534 | 553 | 341 | 364 | 382 |
- One-third of participants say that providing feed childcare, and increasing JobSeeker payments should continue after the current end date (both 36%).
- 18-34 year olds are most likely to say any of the short-term measures should continue after the current end date, whereas 55+ year olds are least likely to support continuing these measures.
- Men are more likely to support continuing the increased JobSeeker payments after 24th September 2020 (39%) than women (33%).
Chinese Barley Tariffs
Q. Last week the Chinese government imposed tariffs on Australian barley exports, costing farmers millions of dollars through lost revenue. To what extent do you agree or disagree about the following statements about international trade with China?
| NET: Agree | NET: Disagree | Strongly agree | Somewhat agree | Neither agree, nor disagree | Somewhat disagree | Strongly disagree | Unsure | |
| The Australian government needs to stand up to the Chinese Government and demand an open inquiry into the origins of Covid-19 | 66% | 9% | 44% | 22% | 14% | 5% | 4% | 11% |
| The Chinese government imposed the tariffs in response to Australia leading calls for an independent inquiry into the origins of Covid-19 | 57% | 15% | 36% | 20% | 16% | 7% | 7% | 13% |
| The Australian government needs to do all it can to avoid a trade war with China | 53% | 17% | 28% | 25% | 19% | 11% | 7% | 11% |
| Australia should impose tariffs on imports from China in retaliation | 48% | 22% | 27% | 21% | 19% | 14% | 7% | 12% |
| Australia should work towards an agreement with China to remove the tariffs on barley, whatever the conditions | 47% | 23% | 20% | 27% | 19% | 12% | 11% | 11% |
| NET: Agree | Age Group | Age Group | ||||||
| Total | 18-34 | 35-54 | 55+ | Labor | NET: Coalition | Greens | NET: Other | |
| The Australian government needs to stand up to the Chinese Government and demand an open inquiry into the origins of Covid-19 | 66% | 52% | 66% | 78% | 60% | 76% | 59% | 69% |
| The Chinese government imposed the tariffs in response to Australia leading calls for an independent inquiry into the origins of Covid-19 | 57% | 46% | 57% | 65% | 59% | 66% | 47% | 52% |
| The Australian government needs to do all it can to avoid a trade war with China | 53% | 49% | 51% | 57% | 58% | 57% | 52% | 36% |
| Australia should impose tariffs on imports from China in retaliation | 48% | 39% | 50% | 53% | 46% | 54% | 42% | 52% |
| Australia should work towards an agreement with China to remove the tariffs on barley, whatever the conditions | 47% | 38% | 48% | 54% | 51% | 52% | 42% | 35% |
| Base (n) | 1,087 | 341 | 364 | 382 | 323 | 428 | 100 | 120 |
- Two-thirds (66%) of participants agree the Australian government needs to stand up to the Chinese Government and demand an open inquiry into the origins of Covid-19.
- More than half of participants agree the Chinese government imposed the tariffs in response to Australia leading calls for an independent inquiry into the origins of Covid-19 (57%) or the Australian government needs to do all it can to avoid a trade war with China (53%).
- Less than half of participants agree that Australia should impose tariffs on imports from China in retaliation (48%) or Australia should work towards an agreement with China to remove the tariffs on barley, whatever the conditions (47%).
- Coalition voters are most likely to agree that the government needs to stand up to the Chinese Government and demand an open inquiry into the origins of Covid-19 (76%); while Labor (60%) and Greens (59%) voters are less likely to agree.
Influence of China
Q. Thinking about Australia’s relationship with China, how do you rate the influence of China on each of the following aspects?
| NET: Positive | NET: Negative | Very positive | Somewhat positive | Somewhat negative | Very negative | Unsure | |
| Australia’s defence, military, and national security | 25% | 51% | 9% | 17% | 27% | 24% | 24% |
| Australia’s international trade | 28% | 58% | 7% | 22% | 26% | 31% | 14% |
| Australia’s culture | 35% | 44% | 9% | 26% | 23% | 21% | 22% |
| Australia’s politics | 23% | 59% | 7% | 16% | 31% | 28% | 18% |
| Chinese corporations and businesses operating in Australia | 22% | 62% | 4% | 17% | 27% | 35% | 17% |
| NET: Positive influence | May’20 | Aug’19 | Change |
| Australia’s defence, military, and national security | 25% | 33% | -8% |
| Australia’s international trade | 28% | 59% | -31% |
| Australia’s culture | 35% | 43% | -8% |
| Australia’s politics | 23% | 30% | -7% |
| Chinese corporations and businesses operating in Australia | 22% | 41% | -19% |
| Base | 1,087 | 1,096 | – |
| NET: Positive influence | Gender | Age Group | |||||
| Total | Male | Female | Labor | NET: Coalition | Greens | NET: Other | |
| Australia’s defence, military, and national security | 25% | 30% | 21% | 23% | 33% | 19% | 21% |
| Australia’s international trade | 28% | 34% | 23% | 28% | 31% | 30% | 24% |
| Australia’s culture | 35% | 38% | 31% | 36% | 34% | 41% | 30% |
| Australia’s politics | 23% | 26% | 20% | 21% | 28% | 18% | 17% |
| Chinese corporations and businesses operating in Australia | 22% | 28% | 16% | 25% | 23% | 19% | 18% |
| Base (n) | 1,087 | 534 | 553 | 323 | 428 | 100 | 120 |
- Compared to August 2019, participants are less likely to rate China’s influence on Australia as positive – particularly in international trade (down 31%) and Chinese corporations operating in Australia (down 19%).
COVID-19 RESEARCH
Read Essential's ongoing research on the public response to Covid-19.
Download this week's ReportEssential Report
Two Party Preferred: 14 May 2019
Labor
51.5%-0.5
Coalition
48.5%+0.5
In this week's report:
Essential Tags
2PP
Abbott
ALP
Approval of opposition leader
Approval of Tony Abbott
asylum seekers
Australian economy
Better Prime Minister
Bill Shorten
Carbon Tax
climate change
coronavirus
covid-19
economy
Education
Election
EMC
environment
ER
Essential Media
Essential Report
Federal Government
federal politics
federal politics voting intention
Gillard
Greens
Julia Gillard
kevin rudd
Labor
Labor Party
leadership
Liberal
Liberal Party
Liberals
media
mining
Nationals
peter lewis
Polling
polls
Prime Minister
tony abbott
two party preferred
voting
Voting intention
Recent Comments
