Q. To what extent do you support or oppose Australia developing nuclear power plants for the generation of electricity?
Total | Gender | Age Group | Federal Voting Intention | |||||||
Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-54 | 55+ | Labor | TOTAL: Coalition | Greens | TOTAL: Other | ||
Strongly support | 20% | 29% | 10% | 14% | 19% | 25% | 16% | 30% | 12% | 20% |
Somewhat support | 30% | 30% | 30% | 33% | 27% | 31% | 26% | 35% | 26% | 27% |
Somewhat oppose | 15% | 14% | 16% | 19% | 14% | 13% | 19% | 12% | 13% | 13% |
Strongly oppose | 17% | 16% | 17% | 14% | 21% | 16% | 20% | 8% | 37% | 24% |
Unsure | 18% | 10% | 27% | 21% | 18% | 16% | 19% | 15% | 11% | 15% |
TOTAL: Support | 50% | 59% | 41% | 47% | 47% | 55% | 42% | 65% | 38% | 47% |
TOTAL: Oppose | 32% | 31% | 33% | 32% | 35% | 28% | 39% | 20% | 50% | 37% |
Base (n) | 1,094 | 539 | 555 | 341 | 368 | 385 | 366 | 397 | 101 | 130 |
Energy sources, preferred energy sources
Q. As you may be aware, many of Australia’s coal-fired power stations are reaching the end of their operational lives and will soon need to be replaced.
Which of the following would you prefer that the government supported?
Total | Gender | Age Group | Federal Voting Intention | |||||||
Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-54 | 55+ | Labor | Liberal + National | Greens | TOTAL: Other | ||
Renewable energy solutions (e.g. wind and solar) | 65% | 52% | 77% | 61% | 72% | 60% | 76% | 51% | 79% | 54% |
New nuclear power stations | 19% | 28% | 10% | 17% | 15% | 25% | 12% | 28% | 11% | 19% |
New coal-fired power stations | 8% | 8% | 9% | 11% | 8% | 7% | 5% | 11% | 3% | 14% |
New gas-fired power stations | 8% | 12% | 4% | 11% | 5% | 8% | 7% | 9% | 7% | 12% |
Base (n) | 1,094 | 539 | 555 | 341 | 368 | 385 | 366 | 397 | 101 | 130 |
Q. To what extent would you support or oppose using nuclear energy sources for the following?
TOTAL: Support | TOTAL: Oppose | Strongly support | Somewhat support | Neither support nor oppose | Somewhat oppose | Strongly oppose | |
To power a submarine fleet for the Royal Australian Navy | 47% | 21% | 22% | 24% | 32% | 11% | 10% |
To establish Australia’s nuclear weapon capabilities | 29% | 38% | 11% | 19% | 33% | 16% | 22% |
To supply power to Australian households and businesses | 48% | 24% | 22% | 26% | 29% | 10% | 13% |
TOTAL: Support | Total | Gender | Age Group | Federal Voting Intention | ||||||
Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-54 | 55+ | Labor | TOTAL: Coalition | Greens | TOTAL: Other | ||
To power a submarine fleet for the Royal Australian Navy | 47% | 56% | 38% | 38% | 43% | 58% | 39% | 66% | 29% | 45% |
To establish Australia’s nuclear weapon capabilities | 29% | 37% | 22% | 32% | 30% | 26% | 26% | 38% | 25% | 32% |
To supply power to Australian households and businesses | 48% | 57% | 38% | 44% | 47% | 51% | 41% | 63% | 34% | 47% |
Base (n) | 1,094 | 539 | 555 | 341 | 368 | 385 | 366 | 397 | 101 | 130 |
AUKUS, International Relations
Q. Australia recently announced a trilateral partnership with the US and UK (known as AUKUS) which will deliver a fleet of nuclear-powered submarines for Australia.
The new security pact sees Australia cancel its previous deal with France’s Naval Group to build conventionally powered submarines.
How strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the new AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine partnership?
TOTAL: Agree | TOTAL: Disagree | Strongly agree | Somewhat agree | Neither agree nor disagree | Somewhat disagree | Strongly disagree | |
Australia is right to build strong relations with the US and UK for its national defence | 62% | 8% | 33% | 29% | 30% | 5% | 3% |
The AUKUS partnership strains Australia’s trade relations with China who see it as a threat | 55% | 8% | 20% | 35% | 37% | 5% | 3% |
The AUKUS partnership may endanger future trade deals with France and the EU | 48% | 13% | 16% | 32% | 39% | 9% | 4% |
The AUKUS partnership is in Australia’s best security and economic interests | 54% | 12% | 26% | 28% | 34% | 7% | 5% |
Total | Gender | Age Group | Federal Voting Intention | |||||||
Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-54 | 55+ | Labor | TOTAL: Coalition | Greens | TOTAL: Other | ||
Australia is right to build strong relations with the US and UK for its national defence | 62% | 68% | 56% | 49% | 58% | 77% | 59% | 78% | 44% | 58% |
The AUKUS partnership strains Australia’s trade relations with China who see it as a threat | 55% | 61% | 49% | 49% | 54% | 61% | 57% | 57% | 65% | 55% |
The AUKUS partnership may endanger future trade deals with France and the EU | 48% | 49% | 47% | 47% | 47% | 49% | 53% | 47% | 64% | 48% |
The AUKUS partnership is in Australia’s best security and economic interests | 54% | 62% | 46% | 45% | 50% | 66% | 49% | 72% | 36% | 47% |
Base (n) | 1,094 | 539 | 555 | 341 | 368 | 385 | 366 | 397 | 101 | 130 |
AUKUS, International Relations
Q. Thinking about the AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine partnership, which is closer to your view?
Total | Gender | Age Group | Federal Voting Intention | |||||||
Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-54 | 55+ | Labor | TOTAL: Coalition | Greens | TOTAL: Other | ||
The AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine partnership will make Australia more secure | 45% | 47% | 44% | 34% | 40% | 60% | 39% | 62% | 30% | 38% |
The AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine partnership will not affect Australia’s security | 36% | 34% | 37% | 48% | 36% | 24% | 39% | 27% | 40% | 33% |
The AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine partnership will make Australia less secure | 19% | 19% | 19% | 18% | 24% | 15% | 22% | 12% | 30% | 29% |
Base (n) | 1,094 | 539 | 555 | 341 | 368 | 385 | 366 | 397 | 101 | 130 |
China, International Relations
Q. Overall, which is closest to your view about Australia’s relationship with China?
Total | Gender | Age Group | Federal Voting Intention | |||||||
Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-54 | 55+ | Labor | TOTAL: Coalition | Greens | TOTAL: Other | ||
Australia’s relationship with China is a positive opportunity to be realised | 10% | 13% | 7% | 14% | 11% | 6% | 11% | 10% | 12% | 8% |
Australia’s relationship with China is a complex relationship to be managed | 66% | 63% | 69% | 65% | 64% | 70% | 66% | 66% | 66% | 61% |
Australia’s relationship with China is a threat to be confronted | 24% | 24% | 23% | 21% | 25% | 24% | 23% | 24% | 21% | 31% |
Base (n) | 1,094 | 539 | 555 | 341 | 368 | 385 | 366 | 397 | 101 | 130 |
covid-19, federal government response
Q. Overall, how would you rate the federal government’s response to the Covid-19 outbreak?
13/09 | 30/08 | 16/08 | 02/08 | 19/07 | 05/07 | 07/06 | 24/05 | 12/04 | 15/03 | 01/03 | 15/02 | 01/02 | |
Very poor | 16% | 16% | 13% | 16% | 13% | 12% | 10% | 6% | 7% | 5% | 6% | 5% | 4% |
Quite poor | 20% | 20% | 22% | 19% | 19% | 17% | 14% | 12% | 10% | 7% | 8% | 7% | 11% |
Neither good nor poor | 21% | 24% | 24% | 28% | 23% | 26% | 22% | 25% | 21% | 18% | 24% | 19% | 19% |
Quite good | 28% | 29% | 32% | 28% | 32% | 33% | 38% | 40% | 40% | 39% | 39% | 42% | 42% |
Very good | 15% | 10% | 9% | 10% | 14% | 11% | 15% | 18% | 22% | 31% | 23% | 27% | 25% |
TOTAL: Poor | 35% | 36% | 35% | 35% | 31% | 30% | 24% | 18% | 17% | 12% | 14% | 12% | 14% |
TOTAL: Good | 43% | 39% | 41% | 38% | 46% | 44% | 53% | 58% | 62% | 70% | 62% | 69% | 67% |
Base (n) | 1,100 | 1,100 | 1,100 | 1,098 | 1,100 | 1,099 | 1,104 | 1,100 | 1,368 | 1,124 | 1,074 | 1,109 | 1,092 |
TOTAL: Good | 13/09 | 30/08 | 16/08 | 02/08 | 19/07 | 05/07 | 07/06 | 24/05 | 12/04 | 15/03 | 01/03 |
NSW | 41% | 34% | 34% | 39% | 49% | 44% | 62% | 56% | 66% | 69% | 64% |
VIC | 39% | 35% | 37% | 33% | 39% | 40% | 42% | 57% | 55% | 65% | 51% |
QLD | 43% | 45% | 44% | 40% | 46% | 48% | 54% | 56% | 63% | 69% | 66% |
SA | 54% | 48% | 45% | 48% | 51% | 48% | 58% | 66% | 62% | 78% | 68% |
WA | 51% | 51% | 53% | 37% | 51% | 42% | 49% | 56% | 65% | 75% | 66% |
covid-19, state government response
Q. How would you rate your state government’s response to the Covid-19 outbreak?
TOTAL: Good | 13/09 | 30/08 | 16/08 | 02/08 | 19/07 | 05/07 | 07/06 | 24/05 | 12/04 | 15/03 | 01/03 | 15/02 | 01/02 |
NSW | 46% | 40% | 42% | 47% | 54% | 57% | 69% | 68% | 73% | 75% | 72% | 72% | 71% |
VIC | 50% | 44% | 56% | 54% | 49% | 50% | 48% | 63% | 58% | 62% | 49% | 59% | 61% |
QLD | 65% | 67% | 66% | 60% | 62% | 61% | 65% | 68% | 72% | 75% | 73% | 76% | 78% |
SA | 67% | 76% | 68% | 73% | 68% | 67% | 67% | 71% | 75% | 85% | 78% | 79% | 80% |
WA | 87% | 78% | 87% | 82% | 77% | 86% | 75% | 77% | 84% | 91% | 85% | 88% | 80% |