Essential Report
Download this week's Report
Government response to Covid-19
Q. Overall, how would you rate the Government’s response to the Covid-19 outbreak?
| 20/04 | 13/04 | 06/04 | 29/03 | 22/03 | |
| Very poor | 5% | 6% | 6% | 11% | 9% |
| Quite poor | 10% | 12% | 15% | 21% | 20% |
| Neither good, nor poor | 21% | 20% | 21% | 24% | 26% |
| Quite good | 42% | 40% | 37% | 34% | 33% |
| Very good | 23% | 23% | 21% | 11% | 12% |
| NET: Poor | 15% | 17% | 21% | 31% | 29% |
| NET: Good | 65% | 63% | 58% | 45% | 45% |
| Base (n) | 1,051 | 1,068 | 1,069 | 1,086 | 1,034 |
| Gender | Age Group | Location | |||||||
| Total | Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-54 | 55+ | Capital | Non-Capital | ||
| Very poor | 5% | 7% | 2% | 6% | 5% | 3% | 5% | 5% | |
| Quite poor | 10% | 11% | 9% | 17% | 8% | 6% | 11% | 8% | |
| Neither good, nor poor | 21% | 19% | 22% | 25% | 24% | 13% | 20% | 22% | |
| Quite good | 42% | 40% | 43% | 38% | 43% | 43% | 42% | 40% | |
| Very good | 23% | 23% | 23% | 13% | 20% | 35% | 22% | 25% | |
| NET: Poor | 15% | 18% | 12% | 23% | 13% | 9% | 16% | 13% | |
| NET: Good | 65% | 63% | 67% | 51% | 63% | 78% | 65% | 65% | |
| Base (n) | 1,051 | 525 | 526 | 341 | 325 | 385 | 722 | 329 | |
- The perception that the Government remains high, with 65% now thinking the Government has done a good job (Very/somewhat) in handling the crisis.
State Government response to Covid-19
Q. How would you rate your state government’s response to the Covid-19 outbreak?
| 20/04 | 13/04 | |
| Very poor | 5% | 5% |
| Quite poor | 9% | 11% |
| Neither good, nor poor | 20% | 20% |
| Quite good | 39% | 38% |
| Very good | 26% | 23% |
| NET: Poor | 14% | 17% |
| NET: Good | 66% | 63% |
| Base (n) | 1,051 | 1,068 |
| State | |||||||
| Total | NSW | VIC | QLD | SA | WA | ||
| Very poor | 5% | 5% | 6% | 3% | 3% | 4% | |
| Quite poor | 9% | 12% | 5% | 11% | 8% | 7% | |
| Neither good, nor poor | 20% | 21% | 20% | 23% | 23% | 12% | |
| Quite good | 39% | 37% | 38% | 47% | 43% | 34% | |
| Very good | 26% | 24% | 32% | 16% | 23% | 43% | |
| NET: Poor | 14% | 17% | 11% | 14% | 11% | 11% | |
| NET: Good | 66% | 61% | 69% | 63% | 66% | 77% | |
| Base (n) | 1,051 | 322 | 275 | 216 | 88 | 106 | |
- Nationally, the perception of state governments’ handling of the crisis in in line with government, with 66% rating their own state’s handling as Very/Quite good (compared to 65%).
- In the past week the rating in Queensland has increased from 52% to 63%, while Victoria has fallen from 76% to 69%. Western Australia and Victoria remain the states with the highest rating.
Easing Restrictions
Q. When do you think governments should start to ease the restrictions on travel and gatherings to allow offices, shops, restaurants, other workplaces and public spaces to start operating again?
| Age Group | Employment Status | |||||||
| Total | 18-34 | 35-54 | 55+ | In paid employment | Not in paid employment | Retired | ||
| As soon as possible | 9% | 17% | 7% | 4% | 11% | 10% | 3% | |
| Within the next 1 to 2 weeks | 6% | 9% | 3% | 5% | 7% | 5% | 4% | |
| Within the next month | 14% | 15% | 13% | 13% | 14% | 15% | 10% | |
| By the end of next month | 13% | 13% | 12% | 15% | 13% | 13% | 16% | |
| It is too soon to consider easing restrictions | 49% | 37% | 51% | 56% | 48% | 40% | 63% | |
| Unsure | 10% | 8% | 14% | 6% | 8% | 16% | 4% | |
| Base (n) | 1,051 | 341 | 325 | 385 | 533 | 268 | 202 | |
| State | |||||||
| Total | NSW | VIC | QLD | SA | WA | ||
| As soon as possible | 9% | 11% | 8% | 9% | 8% | 7% | |
| Within the next 1 to 2 weeks | 6% | 5% | 7% | 6% | 5% | 5% | |
| Within the next month | 14% | 15% | 14% | 13% | 12% | 12% | |
| By the end of next month | 13% | 14% | 13% | 15% | 14% | 14% | |
| It is too soon to consider easing restrictions | 49% | 44% | 53% | 46% | 48% | 54% | |
| Unsure | 10% | 11% | 6% | 12% | 14% | 9% | |
| Base (n) | 1,051 | 322 | 275 | 216 | 88 | 106 | |
- Half of people think it is too soon to consider lifting restrictions. 29% think restrictions should be lifted within the next month (9% as soon as possible, 6% within the next fortnight and 14% within the next month).
- Those most likely to want an immediate easing of restrictions are aged 18-34 (17%), those in paid employment (11%) and people with a high household income (Over $104k p/a, 14%).
- People who are retired (63%) and residents of Victoria (53%) and WA (54%) are most likely to think it too soon to lift restrictions.
Government Covid-19 tracking app
Q. The Federal Government is developing an app to help stop the spread of Covid-19. The TraceTogether app will track a person’s movements by GPS and record if that person comes into contact with someone who is Covid-19 positive.
People have to voluntarily opt-in to download the app onto their mobile phones before their movements can be tracked. Once logged in, the app would track you wherever you went.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about this proposed technology?
| NET: Agree | NET: Disagree | Strongly agree | Somewhat agree | Neither agree nor disagree | Somewhat disagree | Strongly disagree | |
| I would be uncomfortable if the government was able to track all my movements via an app on my mobile phone | 57% | 23% | 28% | 29% | 21% | 13% | 10% |
| This app would help limit the spread of Covid-19 | 52% | 17% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 10% | 7% |
| This app would speed up the removal of physical distancing restrictions | 42% | 18% | 13% | 29% | 39% | 11% | 7% |
| I would download this app onto my mobile phone | 38% | 33% | 15% | 23% | 28% | 14% | 19% |
| I would be concerned with the security of my personal data if this app was on my phone | 63% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 20% | 11% | 6% |
| I’m confident the government will not misuse any data it collects about me via the app | 35% | 36% | 12% | 23% | 29% | 19% | 17% |
- 38% of people agree (strongly/somewhat) that they would download the proposed app to track the spread of Covid-19, 33% of the population disagree.
- Younger people aged 18-34 are more likely to agree they would download the app (44%) than those aged over 35 (35%). 18-34 year olds are also more likely to agree that the app would help stop the spread of the disease (47%) than those aged over 35 (40%).
- There are security and privacy concerns about the app, with 63% concerned about the security of their personal data. 57% are uncomfortable with the government tracking movements and just 35% confident the government can be trusted not to misuse collected data.
Financial situation during Covid-19 outbreak
Q. Which of the following best describes your financial situation during the Covid-19 outbreak?
| NET: Agree | 20/04 | 13/04 | 06/04 | 29/03 | 22/03 |
| I do not expect the Covid-19 will impact my income | 23% | 23% | 24% | 26% | 24% |
| I have sufficient savings to deal with a short-term loss of income | 27% | 29% | 28% | 32% | 26% |
| I will struggle with a short-term loss of income, but will get by | 32% | 33% | 31% | 23% | 29% |
| I will be in serious financial stress with short-term loss of income | 18% | 16% | 16% | 20% | 21% |
| Base (n) | 1,051 | 1,068 | 1,069 | 1,086 | 1,034 |
| Household | Employment | ||||||
| Total | Have dependent children | Do not have dependent children | In paid employment | Not in paid employment | Retired | ||
| I do not expect the Covid-19 will impact my income | 23% | 18% | 26% | 14% | 23% | 46% | |
| I have sufficient savings to deal with a short-term loss of income | 27% | 24% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 34% | |
| I will struggle with a short-term loss of income, but will get by | 32% | 37% | 29% | 38% | 33% | 16% | |
| I will be in serious financial stress with short-term loss of income | 18% | 21% | 16% | 17% | 28% | 4% | |
| Base (n) | 1,051 | 405 | 646 | 533 | 268 | 202 | |
Information about Covid-19
Q. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the information you’ve received about the Covid-19 outbreak?
| NET: Agree | 20/04 | 13/04 | 06/04 | 29/03 | 22/03 |
| I feel informed about the situation and the impact on me and my family | 66% | 71% | 70% | 63% | 64% |
| I trust the Government to provide honest and objective information about the Covid-19 outbreak | 62% | 65% | 63% | 56% | 56% |
| The information I’ve received has been clear and consistent | 55% | 58% | 52% | 47% | 51% |
| I trust the media to provide honest and objective information about the Covid-19 outbreak | 41% | 42% | 51% | 42% | 35% |
| Base (n) | 1,051 | 1,068 | 1,069 | 1,086 | 1,034 |
| NET: Agree | NET: Disagree | Strongly agree | Somewhat agree | Neither agree nor disagree | Somewhat disagree | Strongly disagree | |
| I feel informed about the situation and the impact on me and my family | 66% | 15% | 23% | 43% | 19% | 11% | 4% |
| I trust the Government to provide honest and objective information about the Covid-19 outbreak | 62% | 19% | 23% | 39% | 19% | 12% | 7% |
| The information I’ve received has been clear and consistent | 55% | 26% | 18% | 37% | 19% | 18% | 8% |
| I trust the media to provide honest and objective information about the Covid-19 outbreak | 41% | 32% | 8% | 33% | 26% | 20% | 12% |
Trust in Institutions
Q. How much trust do you have in the following institutions and organisations?
| NET: Total Trust | A lot of trust | Some trust | A little trust | No trust | Unsure | Mar
2019 |
Sep 2018 | Oct 2017 | Sep 2016 | |
| Federal police | 68% | 24% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 5% | 66% | 70% | 71% | 63% |
| State police | 68% | 23% | 45% | 20% | 8% | 4% | 66% | 67% | 67% | 63% |
| The High Court | 61% | 21% | 40% | 23% | 10% | 6% | 58% | 61% | 61% | 57% |
| The Reserve Bank | 60% | 16% | 44% | 23% | 10% | 7% | 49% | 50% | 49% | 47% |
| The ABC | 58% | 19% | 39% | 22% | 12% | 8% | 51% | 54% | 52% | 53% |
| Courts and the legal system | 57% | 16% | 41% | 27% | 12% | 4% | – | – | – | – |
| Charitable organisations | 54% | 12% | 42% | 27% | 13% | 6% | 50% | 47% | 46% | 43% |
| Federal Parliament | 53% | 13% | 40% | 29% | 13% | 5% | 35% | 28% | 30% | 26% |
| Your local council | 53% | 10% | 43% | 29% | 14% | 5% | 43% | 42% | 38% | 36% |
| The Commonwealth public service | 52% | 11% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 8% | 42% | 39% | 38% | 36% |
| State Parliament | 51% | 12% | 40% | 29% | 14% | 6% | 36% | 31% | 31% | 26% |
| Environment groups | 46% | 12% | 33% | 30% | 18% | 7% | 43% | 42% | 42% | 39% |
| Trade unions | 42% | 8% | 34% | 29% | 21% | 9% | 31% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| Business groups | 40% | 6% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 9% | 31% | 29% | 28% | 27% |
| Religious organisations | 35% | 8% | 27% | 28% | 31% | 6% | 27% | 28% | 26% | 26% |
| Political parties | 33% | 5% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 7% | 22% | 15% | 18% | 14% |
- There have been large increases in the trust in institutions and organisations from last year.
- Trust in the following all significantly increased from last year: federal parliament (35% to 53%), state parliament (36% to 51%), local councils (43% to 53%), the Commonwealth public service (42% to 52%), the Reserve bank (49% to 60%), business groups (31% to 40%), trade unions (31% to 42%), religious organisations (27% to 35%) and political parties (22% to 33%).
- Federal and state police (68% trust) remain the most trusted institutions in the list.
Coronavirus concerns
Q. To what extent are you concerned about the threat of Covid-19 (coronavirus) in Australia?
| 13/04 | 06/04 | 29/03 | 22/03 | 09/03 | 10/02 | |
| Very concerned | 45% | 51% | 53% | 39% | 27% | 25% |
| Quite concerned | 43% | 37% | 35% | 43% | 36% | 43% |
| Not that concerned | 9% | 10% | 10% | 14% | 28% | 26% |
| Not at all concerned | 3% | 2% | 3% | 4% | 9% | 6% |
| Base (n) | 1,068 | 1,069 | 1,086 | 1,034 | 1,096 | 1,057 |
| Age group | Location | |||||
| Total | 18-34 | 35-54 | 55+ | Capital | Non-Capital | |
| Very concerned | 45% | 45% | 47% | 45% | 47% | 42% |
| Quite concerned | 43% | 43% | 40% | 44% | 43% | 43% |
| Not that concerned | 9% | 9% | 10% | 8% | 8% | 12% |
| Not at all concerned | 3% | 2% | 3% | 3% | 2% | 4% |
| Base (n) | 1,068 | 343 | 340 | 385 | 722 | 346 |
- Concern about the threat of Covid-19 has lessened this week, with 45% saying they are very concerned (down from 51% last week). The proportion of people who say they are Quite concerned has increased by the equivalent amount from 37% to 43%).
- The proportion of over 55s saying they are very concerned has decreased from 54% to 45, while concern in both capital and regional areas has eased (those very concerned in capital cities has fallen from 53% to 47%, while in regional areas it has moved from 48% to 42%).
COVID-19 RESEARCH
Read Essential's ongoing research on the public response to Covid-19.
Download this week's ReportEssential Report
Two Party Preferred: 14 May 2019
Labor
51.5%-0.5
Coalition
48.5%+0.5
In this week's report:
Essential Tags
2PP
Abbott
ALP
Approval of opposition leader
Approval of Tony Abbott
asylum seekers
Australian economy
Better Prime Minister
Bill Shorten
budget
Carbon Tax
climate change
coronavirus
covid-19
economy
Education
Election
EMC
environment
ER
Essential Media
Essential Report
Federal Government
federal politics
federal politics voting intention
Gillard
Greens
Julia Gillard
kevin rudd
Labor
Labor Party
Liberal
Liberal Party
Liberals
media
mining
Nationals
peter lewis
Polling
polls
Prime Minister
tony abbott
two party preferred
voting
Voting intention
Recent Comments
