Essential Report
Download this week's Report
Government response to Covid-19
Q. Overall, how would you rate the Government’s response to the Covid-19 outbreak?
| 25/05 | 18/05 | 11/05 | 04/05 | 27/04 | 20/04 | 13/04 | 06/04 | 29/03 | |
| Very poor | 4% | 3% | 4% | 4% | 4% | 5% | 6% | 6% | 11% |
| Quite poor | 6% | 7% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 10% | 12% | 15% | 21% |
| Neither good, nor poor | 16% | 17% | 16% | 20% | 17% | 21% | 20% | 21% | 24% |
| Quite good | 43% | 41% | 39% | 38% | 44% | 42% | 40% | 37% | 34% |
| Very good | 30% | 32% | 32% | 28% | 26% | 23% | 23% | 21% | 11% |
| TOTAL: Poor | 11% | 11% | 13% | 14% | 13% | 15% | 17% | 21% | 31% |
| TOTAL: Good | 73% | 73% | 71% | 66% | 70% | 65% | 63% | 58% | 45% |
| Base (n) | 1,087 | 1,073 | 1,067 | 1,093 | 1,054 | 1,051 | 1,068 | 1,069 | 1,086 |
| Gender | Age Group | Location | |||||||
| Total | Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-54 | 55+ | Capital | Non-Capital | ||
| Very poor | 4% | 6% | 3% | 7% | 4% | 3% | 4% | 6% | |
| Quite poor | 6% | 8% | 4% | 8% | 7% | 3% | 6% | 6% | |
| Neither good, nor poor | 16% | 16% | 16% | 21% | 16% | 13% | 16% | 18% | |
| Quite good | 43% | 41% | 44% | 48% | 47% | 34% | 45% | 38% | |
| Very good | 30% | 28% | 32% | 16% | 26% | 47% | 29% | 33% | |
| TOTAL: Poor | 11% | 14% | 7% | 15% | 11% | 6% | 10% | 12% | |
| TOTAL: Good | 73% | 70% | 76% | 63% | 73% | 81% | 74% | 70% | |
| Base (n) | 1,087 | 534 | 553 | 341 | 364 | 382 | 738 | 349 | |
State Government response to Covid-19
Q. How would you rate your state government’s response to the Covid-19 outbreak?
| 25/05 | 18/05 | 11/05 | 04/05 | 27/04 | 20/04 | 13/04 | |
| Very poor | 4% | 3% | 4% | 4% | 4% | 5% | 5% |
| Quite poor | 7% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 9% | 9% | 11% |
| Neither good, nor poor | 17% | 17% | 16% | 18% | 17% | 20% | 20% |
| Quite good | 38% | 39% | 39% | 38% | 41% | 39% | 38% |
| Very good | 35% | 33% | 34% | 31% | 30% | 26% | 26% |
| TOTAL: Poor | 11% | 11% | 12% | 12% | 13% | 14% | 16% |
| TOTAL: Good | 73% | 72% | 73% | 70% | 70% | 66% | 64% |
| Base (n) | 1,087 | 1,073 | 1,067 | 1,093 | 1,054 | 1,051 | 1,068 |
| State | |||||||
| Total | NSW | VIC | QLD | SA | WA | ||
| Very poor | 4% | 5% | 3% | 3% | 2% | 4% | |
| Quite poor | 7% | 8% | 9% | 8% | 2% | 3% | |
| Neither good, nor poor | 17% | 22% | 16% | 15% | 12% | 10% | |
| Quite good | 38% | 41% | 37% | 42% | 38% | 20% | |
| Very good | 35% | 24% | 36% | 32% | 46% | 63% | |
| TOTAL: Poor | 11% | 13% | 11% | 12% | 4% | 7% | |
| TOTAL: Good | 73% | 65% | 73% | 74% | 84% | 83% | |
| Base (n) | 1,087 | 349 | 275 | 220 | 84 | 106 | |
Easing restrictions
Q. When do you think governments should start to ease the restrictions on travel and gatherings to allow offices, shops, restaurants, other workplaces, and public spaces to start operating again?
| 25/05 | 18/05 | 11/05 | 04/05 | 27/04 | 20/04 | |
| As soon as possible | 14% | 9% | 13% | 10% | 10% | 9% |
| Within the next 1 to 2 weeks | 10% | 13% | 12% | 9% | 7% | 6% |
| Within the next month | 23% | 23% | 22% | 21% | 18% | 14% |
| By the end of next month | 17% | 22% | 20% | 15% | 15% | 13% |
| It is too soon to consider easing restrictions | 27% | 25% | 27% | 37% | 42% | 49% |
| Unsure | 9% | 8% | 6% | 8% | 8% | 10% |
| Base (n) | 1,087 | 1,073 | 1,067 | 1,093 | 1,054 | 1,051 |
| Gender | Age Group | ||||||
| Total | Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-54 | 55+ | ||
| As soon as possible | 14% | 18% | 10% | 17% | 12% | 14% | |
| Within the next 1 to 2 weeks | 10% | 11% | 10% | 12% | 9% | 10% | |
| Within the next month | 23% | 24% | 23% | 24% | 22% | 23% | |
| By the end of next month | 17% | 17% | 17% | 15% | 18% | 18% | |
| It is too soon to consider easing restrictions | 27% | 22% | 31% | 23% | 29% | 28% | |
| Unsure | 9% | 8% | 9% | 9% | 10% | 7% | |
| Base (n) | 1,087 | 534 | 553 | 341 | 364 | 382 | |
Continuation of short-term measures
Q. The Federal Government has introduced some short-term measures to help people financially deal with the Covid-19 outbreak. For each of the following, how long do you think do you think the schemes should continue?
| Should end as soon as possible | Should end at current set date | Should continue after the current end date | Unsure | |
| Providing free childcare for children in early childhood education
(Due to end 28th June 2020) |
14% | 33% | 36% | 17% |
| Increase to JobSeeker payments to $1,115 per fortnight
(Due to end 24th September 2020) |
21% | 28% | 36% | 15% |
| Provision of JobKeeper wage subsidy of $1,500 per fortnight to eligible employers for each eligible worker
(Due to end 24th September 2020) |
17% | 36% | 32% | 14% |
| TOTAL: Should continue after the current end date | Gender | Age Group | ||||
| Total | Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-54 | 55+ | |
| Providing free childcare for children in early childhood education | 36% | 39% | 33% | 43% | 34% | 31% |
| Increase to JobSeeker payments to $1,115 per fortnight | 36% | 39% | 33% | 42% | 36% | 30% |
| Provision of JobKeeper wage subsidy of $1,500 per fortnight to eligible employers for each eligible worker | 32% | 35% | 30% | 38% | 32% | 27% |
| Base (n) | 1,087 | 534 | 553 | 341 | 364 | 382 |
- One-third of participants say that providing feed childcare, and increasing JobSeeker payments should continue after the current end date (both 36%).
- 18-34 year olds are most likely to say any of the short-term measures should continue after the current end date, whereas 55+ year olds are least likely to support continuing these measures.
- Men are more likely to support continuing the increased JobSeeker payments after 24th September 2020 (39%) than women (33%).
Closer or more distant social connections
Q. Since the start of the lockdown restrictions, do you feel closer or more distant from each of the following people in your life?
| My partner | My children | My extended family | My neighbours | My friends | My workmates | |
| I feel closer | 36% | 35% | 18% | 13% | 13% | 11% |
| It has not affected our relationship | 53% | 52% | 55% | 64% | 52% | 53% |
| I feel more distant | 11% | 13% | 27% | 23% | 34% | 36% |
| Base | 797 | 716 | 964 | 942 | 1,012 | 680 |
| TOTAL: I feel closer | Gender | Age Group | |||||
| Total | Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-54 | 55+ | ||
| My partner | 36% | 36% | 36% | 49% | 36% | 24% | |
| My children | 35% | 32% | 38% | 50% | 41% | 22% | |
| My extended family | 18% | 18% | 18% | 24% | 19% | 13% | |
| My neighbours | 13% | 14% | 12% | 15% | 13% | 12% | |
| My friends | 13% | 13% | 14% | 19% | 11% | 11% | |
| My workmates | 11% | 11% | 11% | 13% | 11% | 8% | |
| TOTAL: I feel more distant | Gender | Age Group | |||||
| Total | Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-54 | 55+ | ||
| My partner | 11% | 11% | 11% | 15% | 12% | 6% | |
| My children | 13% | 13% | 12% | 11% | 10% | 15% | |
| My extended family | 27% | 26% | 28% | 31% | 27% | 24% | |
| My neighbours | 23% | 21% | 24% | 23% | 21% | 24% | |
| My friends | 34% | 32% | 36% | 42% | 34% | 28% | |
| My workmates | 36% | 34% | 39% | 47% | 32% | 24% | |
- More than half of participants don’t feel closer or more distant to the social connections in their life, varying between 64% for neighbours and 52% for children and friends.
- 18-34 year olds are most likely to say they feel closer to their partner (49%), children (50%) and extended family (24%) – but more distant from their friends (42%) and workmates (47%).
- Participants over 55 are most likely to say their social connections haven’t been affected by the lockdown restrictions.
Likelihood of developing Coronavirus
Q. How likely do you think it is, that you will develop Covid-19?
| 18/05 | 11/05 | 04/05 | 27/04 | 20/04 | 13/04 | 06/04 | 29/03 | 22/03 | 09/03 | |
| Very likely | 6% | 6% | 5% | 5% | 7% | 5% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 7% |
| Somewhat likely | 25% | 24% | 26% | 21% | 25% | 28% | 33% | 36% | 34% | 24% |
| Somewhat unlikely | 48% | 48% | 46% | 50% | 52% | 49% | 45% | 45% | 45% | 43% |
| Very unlikely | 21% | 21% | 23% | 23% | 17% | 18% | 14% | 12% | 13% | 26% |
| Base (n) | 1,073 | 1,067 | 1.093 | 1,054 | 1,051 | 1,068 | 1,069 | 1,086 | 1,034 | 1,096 |
| Age group | Location | |||||
| Total | 18-34 | 35-54 | 55+ | Capital | Non-Capital | |
| Very likely | 6% | 8% | 8% | 3% | 7% | 4% |
| Somewhat likely | 25% | 25% | 29% | 21% | 26% | 24% |
| Somewhat unlikely | 48% | 43% | 42% | 59% | 48% | 49% |
| Very unlikely | 21% | 24% | 21% | 17% | 19% | 24% |
| Base (n) | 1,073 | 339 | 349 | 385 | 730 | 343 |
Government response to Covid-19
Q. Overall, how would you rate the Government’s response to the Covid-19 outbreak?
| 18/05 | 11/05 | 04/05 | 27/04 | 20/04 | 13/04 | 06/04 | 29/03 | 22/03 | |
| Very poor | 3% | 4% | 4% | 4% | 5% | 6% | 6% | 11% | 9% |
| Quite poor | 7% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 10% | 12% | 15% | 21% | 20% |
| Neither good, nor poor | 17% | 16% | 20% | 17% | 21% | 20% | 21% | 24% | 26% |
| Quite good | 41% | 39% | 38% | 44% | 42% | 40% | 37% | 34% | 33% |
| Very good | 32% | 32% | 28% | 26% | 23% | 23% | 21% | 11% | 12% |
| TOTAL: Poor | 11% | 13% | 14% | 13% | 15% | 17% | 21% | 31% | 29% |
| TOTAL: Good | 73% | 71% | 66% | 70% | 65% | 63% | 58% | 45% | 45% |
| Base (n) | 1,073 | 1,067 | 1,093 | 1,054 | 1,051 | 1,068 | 1,069 | 1,086 | 1,034 |
| Gender | Age Group | Location | |||||||
| Total | Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-54 | 55+ | Capital | Non-Capital | ||
| Very poor | 3% | 5% | 2% | 4% | 4% | 2% | 3% | 3% | |
| Quite poor | 7% | 8% | 7% | 10% | 9% | 3% | 7% | 7% | |
| Neither good, nor poor | 17% | 18% | 15% | 25% | 16% | 10% | 15% | 20% | |
| Quite good | 41% | 38% | 43% | 47% | 38% | 38% | 43% | 35% | |
| Very good | 32% | 31% | 33% | 14% | 32% | 47% | 31% | 35% | |
| TOTAL: Poor | 11% | 13% | 8% | 14% | 13% | 5% | 11% | 11% | |
| TOTAL: Good | 73% | 69% | 76% | 61% | 70% | 85% | 74% | 70% | |
| Base (n) | 1,073 | 524 | 549 | 339 | 349 | 385 | 730 | 343 | |
State Government response to Covid-19
Q. How would you rate your state government’s response to the Covid-19 outbreak?
| 18/05 | 11/05 | 04/05 | 27/04 | 20/04 | 13/04 | |
| Very poor | 3% | 4% | 4% | 4% | 5% | 5% |
| Quite poor | 8% | 8% | 8% | 9% | 9% | 11% |
| Neither good, nor poor | 17% | 16% | 18% | 17% | 20% | 20% |
| Quite good | 39% | 39% | 38% | 41% | 39% | 38% |
| Very good | 33% | 34% | 31% | 30% | 26% | 26% |
| TOTAL: Poor | 11% | 12% | 12% | 13% | 14% | 16% |
| TOTAL: Good | 72% | 73% | 70% | 70% | 66% | 64% |
| Base (n) | 1,073 | 1,067 | 1,093 | 1,054 | 1,051 | 1,068 |
| State | |||||||
| Total | NSW | VIC | QLD | SA | WA | ||
| Very poor | 3% | 5% | 3% | 3% | 2% | 0% | |
| Quite poor | 8% | 7% | 10% | 8% | 5% | 4% | |
| Neither good, nor poor | 17% | 18% | 15% | 24% | 13% | 10% | |
| Quite good | 39% | 43% | 38% | 39% | 39% | 33% | |
| Very good | 33% | 27% | 33% | 26% | 41% | 52% | |
| TOTAL: Poor | 11% | 12% | 14% | 10% | 7% | 5% | |
| TOTAL: Good | 72% | 70% | 71% | 66% | 80% | 86% | |
| Base (n) | 1,073 | 352 | 267 | 216 | 85 | 104 | |
COVID-19 RESEARCH
Read Essential's ongoing research on the public response to Covid-19.
Download this week's ReportEssential Report
Two Party Preferred:
Labor
45%
Coalition
48%
In this week's report:
Essential Tags
2PP
Abbott
ALP
Approval of opposition leader
Approval of Tony Abbott
asylum seekers
Australian economy
Bill Shorten
budget
Carbon Tax
climate change
coronavirus
covid-19
economy
Education
Election
EMC
environment
ER
Essential Media
Essential Report
Federal Budget
Federal Government
federal politics
federal politics voting intention
Gillard
Greens
Julia Gillard
kevin rudd
Labor
Labor Party
Liberal
Liberal Party
Liberals
media
mining
Nationals
peter lewis
Polling
polls
Prime Minister
tony abbott
two party preferred
voting
Voting intention
Recent Comments
