The Essential Report Archive Read the latest report

  • Jun, 2011

    , , , , , , , , ,

    Vote if Malcolm Turnbull Liberal Leader

    Q. If Malcolm Turnbull was the leader of the Liberal Party (and Julia Gillard was leader of the Labor Party), to which party will you probably give your first preference vote if a Federal Election was held today? If not sure, which party would you lean toward?

    First preference Total Gave vote
    Liberal 44% 49%
    National 4% 4%
    Total Lib/Nat 48% 53%
    Labor 28% 31%
    Greens 7% 8%
    Other/Independent 7% 8%
    Don’t know 10%

    If Malcolm Turnbull was leader of the Liberal Party (and Julia Gillard was leader of the Labor Party) 31% said they would give their first preference vote to Labor (down 1%) and 53% to the Liberal or National Parties (up 5%). The Greens vote drops 3% to 8%.

    In two party preferred terms, this equates to 41% Labor/59% Liberal/National – a swing of 4% to Liberal/National.

    Most of the increased Liberal/National vote comes from Labor voters  – 13% of Labor voters said they would vote Liberal if Malcolm Turnbull was leader.

    The group with the largest shift to Liberal/National was people on higher incomes.

    Comments »

  • Jun, 2011

    , , , , , , , , ,

    Attributes to describe the Prime Minister

    Q.  Which of the following describe your opinion of the Prime Minister, Julia Gillard?

    5 Jul 10 4 Oct 10 7 Feb 11 27 Jun 11 Difference
    Intelligent 87% 81% 75% 73% -2%
    Hard-working 89% 82% 76% 75% -1%
    A capable leader 72% 59% 52% 42% -10%
    Arrogant 37% 39% 44% 48% +4%
    Out of touch with ordinary people 35% 44% 50% 60% +10%
    Understands the problems facing Australia 68% 55% 52% 44% -8%
    Visionary 48% 38% 30% 26% -4%
    Superficial 51% 52% +1%
    Good in a crisis 61% 46% 46% 41% -5%
    Narrow-minded 28% 35% 43% 46% +3%
    More honest than most politicians 45% 37% 37% 29% -8%
    Trustworthy 49% 42% 40% 30% -10%

    Julia Gillard’s key attributes were hard-working (75%), intelligent (73%) and out of touch with ordinary people (60%).

    Major changes since this question was asked in February were an increase of 10% for out of touch (to 60%) and decreases for a capable leader (down 10% to 42%) and trustworthy (down 10% to 30%).

    Comments »

  • Jun, 2011

    , , , , , , , , , ,

    Attributes to describe the Opposition Leader

    Q.  Which of the following describe your opinion of the Opposition Leader, Tony Abbott?

    5 Jul 10 4 Oct 10 7 Feb 11 27 Jun 11 Change
    Intelligent 70% 71% 64% 61% -3%
    Hard-working 76% 78% 72% 75% +3%
    A capable leader 47% 52% 48% 45% -3%
    Arrogant 59% 60% 58% 60% +2%
    Out of touch with ordinary people 57% 53% 54% 57% +3%
    Understands the problems facing Australia 50% 53% 50% 48% -2%
    Visionary 32% 31% 27% 27%
    Superficial 45% 49% +4%
    Good in a crisis 40% 42% 41% 40% -1%
    Narrow-minded 56% 53% 51% 54% +3%
    More honest than most politicians 33% 32% 31% 32% +1%
    Trustworthy 33% 35% 34% 32% -2%

    Tony Abbott’s key attributes were hard-working (75%), intelligent (61%) and arrogant (60%).

    There have only been minor changes since this question was asked in February.

    Comments »

  • Jun, 2011

    , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    Comparison of Leader Attributes

    Julia Gillard Tony Abbott Difference
    Intelligent 73% 61% +12%
    Hard-working 75% 75%
    A capable leader 42% 45% -3%
    Arrogant 48% 60% -12%
    Out of touch with ordinary people 60% 57% +3%
    Understands the problems facing Australia 44% 48% -4%
    Visionary 26% 27% -1%
    Superficial 52% 49% +3%
    Good in a crisis 41% 40% +1%
    Narrow-minded 46% 54% -8%
    More honest than most politicians 29% 32% -3%
    Trustworthy 30% 32% -2%

    Julia Gillard rates substantially higher than Tony Abbott as intelligent (+12%) and lower on the negative attributes of arrogant (-12%) and narrow-minded (-8%). There were only minor differences on the other attributes.

    Comments »

  • Jun, 2011

    , , , , , , , , , ,

    Is Australia a Better/Worse Place?

    Q. Do you think Australia has become a better or worse place in the year since Julia Gillard became PM? (This question has been commissioned by Network Ten)

    Total Vote Labor Vote Lib/Nat Vote Greens Men Women Age

    18-34

    Aged

    35-54

    Aged 55+
    A better place 13% 32% 4% 22% 16% 11% 16% 11% 11%
    A worse place 51% 17% 82% 27% 57% 46% 42% 53% 61%
    A much better place 3% 9% 1% 2% 5% 2% 2% 3% 3%
    A better place 10% 23% 3% 20% 11% 9% 14% 8% 8%
    A worse place 32% 14% 47% 24% 34% 30% 31% 33% 32%
    A much worse place 19% 3% 35% 3% 23% 16% 11% 20% 29%
    No change 29% 44% 12% 46% 24% 34% 30% 30% 25%
    Don’t know 7% 6% 3% 5% 5% 9% 12% 6% 3%

    Half the people surveyed (51%) think Australia has become a worse place in the year since Julia Gillard became PM. 13% think it has become a better place and 29% say there has been no change.

    82% of Liberal/National voters think it has become a worse place while 46% of Greens voters and 44% of Labor voters think there has been no change.

    The most negative groups were men (57% worse) and those aged 55+ (61% worse).

    Comments »

  • Jun, 2011

    , , , , , , ,

    Rating of Economy

    Q. Australia is currently experiencing a boom in the mining industry. Apart from mining, how would you rate the rest of Australia’s economy?

    Total Vote Labor Vote Lib/Nat Vote Greens
    Total good 31% 44% 21% 49%
    Total poor 26% 12% 35% 17%
    Very good 4% 6% 2% 8%
    Good 27% 38% 19% 41%
    Average 40% 42% 43% 34%
    Poor 18% 9% 23% 15%
    Very poor 8% 3% 12% 2%
    Don’t know 3% 2% 2% 1%

    31% rate the Australian economy (excluding mining) as good and 26% rate it poor. 40% rate it average. Labor voters (44% good/26% poor) and Greens voters (49%/17%) are most positive about the economy. Liberal/National voters rate the economy 21% good/35% poor.

    36% of those aged 18-34 rate the economy good compared to 25% of those aged 55+.

    Comments »

  • Jun, 2011

    , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    Federal politics – voting intention

    Q. If a Federal Election was held today to which party will you probably give your first preference vote? If not sure, which party are you currently leaning toward?

    Q. If don’t know -Well which party are you currently leaning to?

    sample size = 2068

    First preference/leaning to Election

    21 Aug 10

    4 weeks ago 2 weeks ago Last week This week
    Liberal 44% 44% 44% 45%
    National 3% 2% 3% 3%
    Total Lib/Nat 43.6 46% 46% 46% 47%
    Labor 38.0 34% 34% 34% 32%
    Greens 11.8 12% 12% 12% 12%
    Other/Independent 6.6 8% 8% 8% 9%
    2PP Election

    21 Aug 10

    4 weeks ago 2 weeks ago Last week This week
    Total Lib/Nat 49.9% 53% 53% 54% 55%
    Labor 50.1% 47% 47% 46% 45%

    NB.  The data in the above tables comprise 2-week averages derived the first preference/leaning to voting questions.  Respondents who select ‘don’t know’ are not included in the results.  The two-party preferred estimate is calculated by distributing the votes of the other parties according to their preferences at the 2010 election.

    Comments »

  • Jun, 2011

    , , , , , , , , ,

    Asylum Seeker Plans

    Q. The Government has proposed sending asylum seekers arriving by boat to Malaysia for processing and the Opposition has proposed sending asylum seekers to Nauru. Which of these two options do you favour?

    Total Vote Labor Vote Lib/Nat Vote Greens
    Malaysia 16% 29% 12% 9%
    Nauru 34% 18% 55% 12%
    Neither 30% 34% 18% 61%
    Don’t know 20% 20% 14% 18%

    34% favoured sending asylum seekers to Nauru and 16% favoured Malaysia, with a further 30% selecting ‘neither’.

    Labor (34%) and Green voters (61%) were most likely to favour ‘neither’ – Liberal/National voters were most likely to favour Nauru (55%).

    Males (37%) were more likely than females (31%) to favour Nauru. Females were more likely to select Don’t Know (25%).

    Older respondents were more likely to favour Nauru – 48% of those aged 55+.

    Younger respondents were more likely to select ‘neither’ – 37% of those aged 18-34.

    Comments »

Error: