Essential Report
Download this week's Report
State Government response to Covid-19
Q. How would you rate your state government’s response to the Covid-19 outbreak?
| 22/08 | 15/06 | 08/06 | 01/06 | 25/05 | 18/05 | 11/05 | 04/05 | 27/04 | 20/04 | |
| Very poor | 5% | 4% | 4% | 6% | 4% | 3% | 4% | 4% | 4% | 5% |
| Quite poor | 8% | 8% | 7% | 6% | 7% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 9% | 9% |
| Neither good, nor poor | 17% | 17% | 17% | 20% | 17% | 17% | 16% | 18% | 17% | 20% |
| Quite good | 41% | 38% | 39% | 38% | 38% | 39% | 39% | 38% | 41% | 39% |
| Very good | 28% | 33% | 32% | 30% | 35% | 33% | 34% | 31% | 30% | 26% |
| TOTAL: Poor | 13% | 12% | 11% | 12% | 11% | 11% | 12% | 12% | 13% | 14% |
| TOTAL: Good | 69% | 71% | 71% | 68% | 73% | 72% | 73% | 70% | 70% | 66% |
| Base (n) | 1,079 | 1,087 | 1,073 | 1,059 | 1,087 | 1,073 | 1,067 | 1,093 | 1,054 | 1,051 |
| State | |||||||
| Total | NSW | VIC | QLD | SA | WA | ||
| Very poor | 5% | 4% | 8% | 6% | 4% | 4% | |
| Quite poor | 8% | 8% | 5% | 14% | 5% | 4% | |
| Neither good, nor poor | 17% | 18% | 22% | 15% | 13% | 17% | |
| Quite good | 41% | 45% | 38% | 42% | 39% | 27% | |
| Very good | 28% | 25% | 26% | 22% | 40% | 48% | |
| TOTAL: Poor | 13% | 12% | 13% | 20% | 8% | 8% | |
| TOTAL: Good | 69% | 70% | 65% | 64% | 79% | 75% | |
| Base (n) | 1,079 | 352 | 261 | 216 | 88 | 110 | |
- Victorian rating of their state government’s response is down 10% this week (from 75% to 65%) with 19 new cases of Covid-19 recorded this weekend.
Coronavirus concerns
Q. To what extent are you concerned about the threat of Covid-19 (coronavirus) in Australia?
| 15/06 | 08/06 | 01/06 | 25/05 | 18/05 | 11/05 | 04/05 | 27/04 | 20/04 | 13/04 | |
| Very concerned | 28% | 27% | 32% | 30% | 33% | 34% | 32% | 39% | 44% | 45% |
| Quite concerned | 45% | 48% | 49% | 49% | 47% | 49% | 46% | 44% | 43% | 43% |
| Not that concerned | 23% | 21% | 15% | 16% | 16% | 14% | 18% | 13% | 11% | 9% |
| Not at all concerned | 4% | 5% | 4% | 5% | 4% | 3% | 4% | 3% | 2% | 3% |
| Base (n) | 1,087 | 1,073 | 1,059 | 1,087 | 1,073 | 1,067 | 1,093 | 1,054 | 1,051 | 1,068 |
Likelihood of developing Coronavirus
Q. How likely do you think it is, that you will develop Covid-19?
| 15/06 | 08/06 | 01/06 | 25/05 | 18/05 | 11/05 | 04/05 | 27/04 | 20/04 | 13/04 | |
| Very likely | 6% | 6% | 7% | 5% | 6% | 6% | 5% | 5% | 7% | 5% |
| Somewhat likely | 19% | 22% | 23% | 22% | 25% | 24% | 26% | 21% | 25% | 28% |
| Somewhat unlikely | 49% | 47% | 48% | 51% | 48% | 48% | 46% | 50% | 52% | 49% |
| Very unlikely | 26% | 25% | 22% | 23% | 21% | 21% | 23% | 23% | 17% | 18% |
| Base (n) | 1,087 | 1,073 | 1,059 | 1,087 | 1,073 | 1,067 | 1.093 | 1,054 | 1,051 | 1,068 |
Government response to Covid-19
Q. Overall, how would you rate the Government’s response to the Covid-19 outbreak?
| 15/06 | 08/06 | 01/06 | 25/05 | 18/05 | 11/05 | 04/05 | 27/04 | 20/04 | 13/04 | |
| Very poor | 3% | 4% | 5% | 4% | 3% | 4% | 4% | 4% | 5% | 6% |
| Quite poor | 8% | 8% | 7% | 6% | 7% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 10% | 12% |
| Neither good, nor poor | 16% | 18% | 20% | 16% | 17% | 16% | 20% | 17% | 21% | 20% |
| Quite good | 42% | 40% | 39% | 43% | 41% | 39% | 38% | 44% | 42% | 40% |
| Very good | 30% | 30% | 28% | 30% | 32% | 32% | 28% | 26% | 23% | 23% |
| TOTAL: Poor | 11% | 12% | 12% | 11% | 11% | 13% | 14% | 13% | 15% | 17% |
| TOTAL: Good | 72% | 70% | 68% | 73% | 73% | 71% | 66% | 70% | 65% | 63% |
| Base (n) | 1,087 | 1,073 | 1,059 | 1,087 | 1,073 | 1,067 | 1,093 | 1,054 | 1,051 | 1,068 |
| Gender | Age Group | Location | |||||||
| Total | Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-54 | 55+ | Capital | Non-Capital | ||
| Very poor | 3% | 5% | 1% | 5% | 2% | 2% | 3% | 2% | |
| Quite poor | 8% | 8% | 8% | 11% | 7% | 7% | 8% | 8% | |
| Neither good, nor poor | 16% | 17% | 16% | 26% | 15% | 9% | 17% | 15% | |
| Quite good | 42% | 40% | 44% | 41% | 48% | 38% | 43% | 41% | |
| Very good | 30% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 28% | 44% | 29% | 34% | |
| TOTAL: Poor | 11% | 13% | 10% | 16% | 9% | 9% | 12% | 10% | |
| TOTAL: Good | 72% | 71% | 74% | 58% | 76% | 81% | 71% | 75% | |
| Base (n) | 1,087 | 538 | 549 | 341 | 361 | 385 | 741 | 346 | |
State Government response to Covid-19
Q. How would you rate your state government’s response to the Covid-19 outbreak?
| 15/06 | 08/06 | 01/06 | 25/05 | 18/05 | 11/05 | 04/05 | 27/04 | 20/04 | |
| Very poor | 4% | 4% | 6% | 4% | 3% | 4% | 4% | 4% | 5% |
| Quite poor | 8% | 7% | 6% | 7% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 9% | 9% |
| Neither good, nor poor | 17% | 17% | 20% | 17% | 17% | 16% | 18% | 17% | 20% |
| Quite good | 38% | 39% | 38% | 38% | 39% | 39% | 38% | 41% | 39% |
| Very good | 33% | 32% | 30% | 35% | 33% | 34% | 31% | 30% | 26% |
| TOTAL: Poor | 12% | 11% | 12% | 11% | 11% | 12% | 12% | 13% | 14% |
| TOTAL: Good | 71% | 71% | 68% | 73% | 72% | 73% | 70% | 70% | 66% |
| Base (n) | 1,087 | 1,073 | 1,059 | 1,087 | 1,073 | 1,067 | 1,093 | 1,054 | 1,051 |
| State | |||||||
| Total | NSW | VIC | QLD | SA | WA | ||
| Very poor | 4% | 4% | 6% | 6% | 1% | 3% | |
| Quite poor | 8% | 9% | 5% | 12% | 6% | 4% | |
| Neither good, nor poor | 17% | 22% | 13% | 15% | 17% | 17% | |
| Quite good | 38% | 41% | 39% | 39% | 40% | 28% | |
| Very good | 33% | 24% | 36% | 28% | 36% | 49% | |
| TOTAL: Poor | 12% | 13% | 11% | 18% | 7% | 6% | |
| TOTAL: Good | 71% | 65% | 75% | 67% | 76% | 77% | |
| Base (n) | 1,087 | 352 | 275 | 217 | 83 | 107 | |
Continuation of short-term measures
Q. The Federal Government has introduced some short-term measures to help people financially deal with the Covid-19 outbreak. For each of the following, how long do you think do you think the schemes should continue?
| Should end as soon as possible | Should end at current set date | Should continue after the current end date | Unsure | ||
| Providing free childcare for children in early childhood education
(Due to end 28th June 2020) |
May | 14% | 33% | 36% | 17% |
| June | 14% | 28% | 43% | 14% | |
| Increase to JobSeeker payments to $1,115 per fortnight
(Due to end 24th September 2020) |
May | 21% | 28% | 36% | 15% |
| June | 17% | 32% | 38% | 13% | |
| Provision of JobKeeper wage subsidy of $1,500 per fortnight to eligible employers for each eligible worker
(Due to end 24th September 2020) |
May | 17% | 36% | 32% | 14% |
| June | 14% | 40% | 34% | 13% |
| TOTAL: Should continue after the current end date | Gender | Age Group | ||||
| Total | Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-54 | 55+ | |
| Providing free childcare for children in early childhood education | 43% | 43% | 44% | 52% | 45% | 35% |
| Increase to JobSeeker payments to $1,115 per fortnight | 38% | 38% | 37% | 39% | 40% | 33% |
| Provision of JobKeeper wage subsidy of $1,500 per fortnight to eligible employers for each eligible worker | 34% | 34% | 34% | 37% | 41% | 24% |
| Base (n) | 1,087 | 538 | 549 | 341 | 361 | 385 |
- Support for extending the free childcare scheme beyond the current end date of 28th June has increased from 36% last month to 43%.
- There has been no significant changes in the proportion of people who think the Jobkeeper (now at 34%) or Jobseeker (now at 38%) schemes should be extended beyond September.
- Support for extending the free early childcare scheme is higher among those aged 18-34 than those aged over 55 (52% to 35%).
Agreement with changes to Jobkeeper for early learning professionals
Q. This week the Government announced that from 20th July, it would stop paying the economy wide Jobkeeper wage subsidy to childcare services. It would be replaced by transition payments that may be less than the amount of Jobkeeper.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements amount the removal of Jobkeeper for childcare professionals?
| TOTAL: Agree | TOTAL: Disagree | Strongly agree | Somewhat agree | Somewhat disagree | Strongly disagree | Unsure | |
| Withdrawing this support puts businesses and jobs at risks if there is a second outbreak of Covid-19 or lockdown restrictions are re-introduced | 64% | 20% | 27% | 37% | 15% | 5% | 16% |
| It is the right time to start to remove the Government funding for some industries | 57% | 28% | 21% | 36% | 19% | 9% | 15% |
| It is too soon to withdraw this support for the childcare sector when many children are not yet back in childcare | 55% | 30% | 24% | 32% | 20% | 9% | 15% |
| The Government has broken its promise to maintain the Jobkeeper program until September | 53% | 26% | 22% | 30% | 18% | 9% | 21% |
| I am worried that the Government will remove Jobkeeper support from other industries before the end of September | 53% | 28% | 22% | 31% | 19% | 9% | 19% |
| Federal Voting intention | |||||||
| TOTAL: Agreement | Total | Labor | Coalition | Greens | TOTAL: Other | ||
| Withdrawing this support puts businesses and jobs at risks if there is a second outbreak of Covid-19 or lockdown restrictions are re-introduced | 64% | 71% | 59% | 73% | 66% | ||
| It is the right time to start to remove the Government funding for some industries | 57% | 53% | 71% | 39% | 50% | ||
| It is too soon to withdraw this support for the childcare sector when many children are not yet back in childcare | 55% | 65% | 45% | 70% | 62% | ||
| The Government has broken its promise to maintain the Jobkeeper program until September | 53% | 62% | 43% | 67% | 57% | ||
| I am worried that the Government will remove Jobkeeper support from other industries before the end of September | 53% | 61% | 46% | 69% | 54% | ||
| Base (n) | 1,087 | 334 | 412 | 96 | 140 | ||
- 64% of people agree that the withdrawal of Jobkeeper could put businesses at risk if a second outbreak occurs.
- Over half of people agree that the Government’s decision to change the conditions of the Jobkeeper scheme for early childcare workers means that the Government has broken its promise to keep Jobkeeper until September (53%). Similar numbers agree that ‘It is too soon to withdraw this support for the childcare sector when many children are not yet back in childcare’ (55%) and ‘I am worried that the Government will remove Jobkeeper support from other industries before the end of September’
- 57% agree that it is the right time for the Government to start withdrawing funding for some industries.
Agreement with protests in Australia
Q. Following the protests in the United States of America, there have been demonstrations in Australia oppose the deaths of Indigenous people in police custody.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the protests in Australia?
| TOTAL: Agree | TOTAL: Disagree | Strongly agree | Somewhat agree | Somewhat disagree | Strongly disagree | Unsure | |
| Protesters gathering in large numbers during the Covid-19 puts the entire community at risk | 84% | 9% | 62% | 23% | 5% | 4% | 7% |
| Protesters are justified in their demands for authorities to address the issue of Indigenous deaths in custody | 62% | 27% | 31% | 32% | 11% | 16% | 11% |
| The situation in America is very different to Australia and has no relevance | 61% | 30% | 34% | 27% | 18% | 12% | 10% |
| TOTAL: Agreement | Gender | Age Group | ||||
| Total | Male | Female | 18-34 | 35-54 | 55+ | |
| Protesters gathering in large numbers during the Covid-19 puts the entire community at risk | 84% | 86% | 82% | 78% | 87% | 87% |
| Protesters are justified in their demands for authorities to address the issue of Indigenous deaths in custody | 62% | 64% | 60% | 69% | 63% | 56% |
| The situation in America is very different to Australia and has no relevance | 61% | 67% | 54% | 54% | 62% | 64% |
| Base (n) | 1,087 | 534 | 553 | 341 | 364 | 382 |
- While a large majority of people agree that the protests pit the community at risk by spreading Covid-19 (84%), 62% agree that protesters are justified in their demands for authorities to address the issue of Indigenous deaths in custody.
- Men (67%), those aged over 55 (64%) and Coalition voters (74%) are more likely to agree that ‘The situation in America is very different to Australia and has no relevance’ compared to women (54%), those aged under 35 (54%) and Labor and Greens voters (54% and 38%).
COVID-19 RESEARCH
Read Essential's ongoing research on the public response to Covid-19.
Download this week's ReportEssential Report
Two Party Preferred:
Labor
47%
Coalition
45%
In this week's report:
Essential Tags
2PP
Abbott
ALP
Approval of opposition leader
Approval of Tony Abbott
asylum seekers
Australian economy
Better Prime Minister
Bill Shorten
budget
Carbon Tax
climate change
coronavirus
covid-19
economy
Education
Election
EMC
environment
ER
Essential Media
Essential Report
Federal Government
federal politics
federal politics voting intention
Gillard
Greens
Julia Gillard
kevin rudd
Labor
Labor Party
Liberal
Liberal Party
Liberals
media
mining
Nationals
peter lewis
Polling
polls
Prime Minister
tony abbott
two party preferred
voting
Voting intention
Recent Comments
