The Essential Report Archive Read the latest report

  • Mar, 2010

    , , , ,

    Federal takeover of hospitals and health services

    Q. Do you support or oppose the Federal Government’s plan to take over the responsibility for funding hospitals and health services from the State Governments?

                %
    Total support 58%
    Total oppose 12%
    Strongly support 25%
    Support            33%
    Neither support nor oppose 21%
    Oppose            7%
    Strongly oppose          5%
    Don’t know 9%

    Over half (58%) of those surveyed support the Federal Government’s plan to take over the responsibility for funding hospitals and health services from the State Governments, 12% oppose, 21% neither support nor oppose and 9% don’t know.

    79% of Labor voters, 46% of Coalition voters and 55% of Green voters support a Federal takeover for funding of hospitals and health services from the State Governments.  27% of Coalition voters neither support nor oppose the plan and 22% oppose it. 

    Males were more likely than females to support the plan (61% v 56%). 

    Support for a Federal takeover was highest amongst 55 – 64 year olds (67%). 

    People in NSW were more likely than those in other states to support a Federal takeover (64%). 55% of people in Queensland and 52% in Victoria support the plan. 

    In February this year we asked the Australian public whether they support or oppose a Federal takeover of hospitals. We found that 58% supported a Federal takeover, 10% opposed it, 19% neither supported nor opposed and 13% didn’t know.  Comments »

  • Feb, 2010

    , , , ,

    Federal takeover of hospitals from the State Government

    Q. Would you support or oppose the Federal Government taking over the responsibility for hospitals from the State Governments?

      %
    Total support 58%
    Total oppose   10%
    Strongly support 26%
    Support 32%
    Neither support nor oppose 19%
    Oppose 7%
    Strongly oppose 3%
    Don’t know 13%

     Over half (58%) of those surveyed support the Federal Government taking over responsibility for hospitals from the State Governments, 10% disapprove, 19% neither support nor oppose and 13% don’t know. 

     People aged 55 years and over were more likely that those in other age groups to support a Federal Government takeover of hospitals (79%).

     People in NSW were more likely than those in any other states to support a hospitals takeover (67%), while people in Western Australia (18%) and South Australia (17%) were more likely to oppose such a move. 

     Males were more likely than females to support a hospital takeover by the Federal Government (65% v 52%). 

     Support for a Federal Government takeover of hospitals from the State Government was highest amongst Labor voters (70%), followed by Coalition voters (63%) and then Green voters (54%). Comments »

  • Nov, 2009

    , , , , , , , ,

    Federal Government Handling of Asylum Seekers

    Q. Thinking about the way the Federal Government has handled the asylum seeker issue recently, do you think they have been too tough, too weak or have they taken about the right approach?

    %
    Too tough 9%
    Too weak 52%
    Taken about the right approach 28%
    Don’t know 11%

    Just over half (52%) think that the Federal Government has been too weak in how it has handled the asylum seeker issue recently, 28% think the Government have taken the right approach and 9% think they have been too tough.

    Males were more likely than females to think the Federal Government has been too weak (55% v 49%).

    People aged 55 years and over were more likely than 18 – 24 year olds to think the Government’s action has been too weak (64% v 32%).

    Labor voters were more likely to think the Federal Government has taken about the right approach (43%), Coalition voters were more likely to think the Government has been too weak (76%) and Green voters were more likely to think the Government’s approach has been too tough (33%).

    43% of Labor voters think the Federal Government has been too weak in its handling of the asylum seeker issue recently.

    Comments »

  • Nov, 2009

    , , ,

    Oil Leak Near The Kimberley Coast

    Q. Thinking about the oil rig off the Kimberley coast which has recently caught fire after leaking oil and gas into the ocean for 10 weeks – do agree or disagree that if the oil spill had occurred near an area like the Great Barrier Reef, the Federal Government would have done much more to prevent damage to the marine environment?

    %
    Total agree 75%
    Total disagree 7%
    Strongly agree 41%
    Somewhat agree 34%
    Somewhat disagree 6%
    Strongly disagree 1%
    Don’t know 17%

    75% of people agree that the Federal Government should have done much more to prevent damage to the marine environment after the recent oil spill off the Kimberley coast.

    Comments »

Error: