climate change, cyclone, EMC, ER, Essential Media, Essential Report, flooding, Greens, Labor, Liberal, Natural Disasters, Polling, polls, recent floods
Q. Does the extreme nature of the recent floods and cyclone make it more or less important for Australia to take action to address climate change or does it make no difference?
| Total | Vote Labor | Vote Lib/Nat | Vote Greens | |
| Total more important | 49% | 60% | 35% | 83% |
| Total no difference/less important | 47% | 38% | 63% | 14% |
| Much more important | 27% | 35% | 16% | 59% |
| A little more important | 22% | 25% | 19% | 24% |
| Makes no difference | 44% | 37% | 57% | 12% |
| A little less important | 1% | * | 1% | 2% |
| Much less important | 3% | * | 6% | – |
| Don’t know | 4% | 2% | 2% | 4% |
49% believe that the extreme nature of the recent floods and cyclone make it more important for Australia to take action to address climate change and 47% think it makes no difference or is less important.
Opinions tend to be related to voting intention – 60% of Labor voters and 83% of Greens voters believe it is more important, while 63% of Liberal/National voters think it makes no difference or is less important. 55% of respondents aged under 35 think it is more important compared to 39% of those aged 65+
EMC, ER, Essential Report, Flood Damage, flood levy, Flood Response, flooding, Floods, levy, Polling, polls, recent floods, taxpayers
Q. The Federal Government has announced a one-off levy on tax-payers and cuts in spending to fund the damage from the recent floods across Australia. Do you agree or disagree with each of the following actions they have taken?
| Total agree | Total disagree | Strongly agree | Agree | Disagree | Strongly disagree | Don’t know | |
| A levy on taxpayers earning over $50,000 | 44% | 50% | 14% | 30% | 23% | 27% | 7% |
| Scrapped cash for clunkers (Grants for owners of old cars to buy new cars) | 59% | 29% | 24% | 35% | 18% | 11% | 11% |
| Scrapped the Green Car innovation fund | 43% | 39% | 16% | 27% | 25% | 14% | 17% |
| Deferred grants for development of carbon capture and storage technology | 45% | 40% | 17% | 28% | 26% | 14% | 16% |
| Deferred or capped grants for solar energy programs | 32% | 56% | 10% | 22% | 33% | 23% | 12% |
| Scrapped Higher Education Capital Development Pool (for building new tertiary education centres) | 31% | 51% | 9% | 22% | 33% | 18% | 17% |
Respondents were more likely to agree with the Government decisions to scrap cash for clunkers (59% agree/29% disagree), scrap the Green Car innovation fund (43%/39%) and defer grants for development of carbon capture and storage technology (45%/40%).
However, they tended to disagree with the levy on taxpayers earning over $50,000 (50% disagree/44% agree), defer or cap grants for solar energy programs (56%/32%) and scrap Higher Education Capital Development Pool (51%/31%).
70% of Labor voters agreed with the levy and 26% disagreed while Coalition supporters disagreed 69% to 24% agreed. Older respondents were more likely to agree with the levy – 50% of those aged 45+ agreed and 43% disagreed. For those aged under 45, 38% agreed and 53% disagreed.
Channel 10, EMC, ER, Essential Report, Flood Damage, flood levy, flooding, Floods, Network 10, Network Ten, recent floods
Q. Do you approve or disapprove of the Government introducing a one-off levy on taxpayers to pay for damage caused by the recent floods? (Question commissioned by Network Ten)
| Total | Vote Labor | Vote Lib/Nat | Vote Greens | Queensland | NSW | Victoria | Other states | |
| Total approve | 39% | 63% | 23% | 48% | 46% | 35% | 37% | 43% |
| Total disapprove | 53% | 31% | 73% | 41% | 46% | 57% | 56% | 51% |
| Strongly approve | 12% | 24% | 3% | 19% | 11% | 10% | 12% | 14% |
| Approve | 27% | 39% | 20% | 29% | 35% | 25% | 25% | 27% |
| Disapprove | 24% | 20% | 28% | 21% | 21% | 25% | 27% | 22% |
| Strongly disapprove | 29% | 11% | 45% | 20% | 25% | 32% | 29% | 29% |
| Don’t know | 8% | 6% | 5% | 10% | 9% | 8% | 6% | 9% |
39% approved of the Government introducing a one-off levy on taxpayers to pay for damage caused by the recent floods and 53% disapproved.
63% of Labor voters approved but Liberal/National voters strongly disapproved (73%).
Queensland residents were more likely to approve than residents of other states.
By income, those earning under $52,000 per year disapproved 47% to 44% approved and those earning over $52,000 disapproved 57% to 38% approved.
Question commissioned by Ten network.
EMC, ER, Essential Report, Flood Damage, flooding, Floods, funding flood damage, Government spending, recent floods
Q. Which of the following do you think is the best way for the Government to pay for the damage caused by the recent floods?
| Total | Vote Labor | Vote Lib/Nat | Vote Greens | |
| Introduce a one-off levy | 22% | 42% | 9% | 22% |
| Sell off Medibank Private | 2% | 1% | 4% | 2% |
| Scrap or postpone the NBN (National Broadband Network) | 28% | 11% | 48% | 10% |
| Postpone returning the budget to surplus | 24% | 26% | 23% | 27% |
| Raise taxes on mining company profits | 10% | 10% | 6% | 23% |
| None of them | 7% | 5% | 7% | 9% |
| Don’t know | 7% | 5% | 3% | 7% |
Overall, there was no clearly preferred means of funding the flood damage. The most supported ways to fund flood damage were to scrap or postpone the NBN (28%), postpone returning the budget to surplus (24%) and introducing a one-off levy (22%). Only 2% favoured selling Medibank Private. Labor voters favoured the levy (42%) and Liberal/National voters favoured scrapping or postponing the NBN (48%).
Greens voters were split between postponing the return to surplus (27%), a tax on mining company profits (23%) and introducing a levy (22%).
Scrapping or postponing the NBN was strongly favoured by those aged 55+ (40%).