The Essential Report Archive Read the latest report

  • Apr, 2021

    , ,

    Views towards interstate travel during Covid-19

    Q. The federal government recently announced incentives for Australians to travel to tourist destinations in Australia that have been badly affected by the lack of international visitors.

    How strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statements?

      TOTAL: Agree TOTAL: Disagree Strongly agree Somewhat agree Neither agree nor disagree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree
    As the Brisbane lockdown shows, there’s not much point in the federal government encouraging people to travel to other parts of Australia until the vaccine program has been completed 57% 18% 24% 33% 24% 12% 6%
    I would be nervous about booking a trip to another state because it’s impossible to predict if the trip will suddenly be cancelled because of a Covid-19 outbreak 69% 14% 34% 35% 17% 8% 5%

     

    TOTAL: Agree Total Gender Age Group Federal Voting Intention
    Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ Labor TOTAL: Coalition Greens TOTAL: Other
    As the Brisbane lockdown shows, there’s not much point in the federal government encouraging people to travel to other parts of Australia until the vaccine program has been completed 57% 58% 57% 51% 58% 63% 60% 58% 59% 56%
    I would be nervous about booking a trip to another state because it’s impossible to predict if the trip will suddenly be cancelled because of a Covid-19 outbreak 69% 69% 69% 64% 69% 75% 71% 72% 72% 63%
    Base (n) 1,368 669 699 426 460 482 483 471 123 165
    • The majority (69%) of Australians agree they would be nervous about booking a trip to another state because it’s impossible to predict if the trip will suddenly be cancelled because of a Covid-19 outbreak.
    • Most (57%) also agree that as the Brisbane lockdown shows, there’s not much point in the federal government encouraging people to travel to other parts of Australia until the vaccine program has been completed.
    • Those over 55 are more likely to agree with these statements than younger cohorts.
  • Apr, 2021

    ,

    Views towards end of JobKeeper and JobSeeker supplement

    Q. As you may be aware, the last JobKeeper payments will be paid in April 2021. JobKeeper was a fortnightly amount being paid through employers to help with employees’ wages. The supplement to JobSeeker also ends this month. This will mean that people who are unemployed get $50 less per week.

    How strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the end of JobKeeper and the supplement to JobSeeker?

      TOTAL: Agree TOTAL: Disagree Strongly agree Somewhat agree Neither agree nor disagree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree
    I’m worried about how it will affect me 33% 41% 14% 18% 26% 16% 25%
    I’m worried about how it will affect the economy 58% 15% 23% 36% 27% 10% 5%
    There are a lot of businesses which have been surviving only because of JobKeeper and are unlikely to ever return 65% 9% 25% 40% 27% 5% 3%
    The schemes should have been extended at least until the Covid-19 vaccine program is fully rolled out 48% 25% 22% 26% 26% 15% 11%
    The schemes were far too expensive to continue any longer 53% 22% 22% 31% 26% 12% 9%
    Big companies that have made a profit and paid dividends and bonuses should be forced to repay JobKeeper payments they received 66% 11% 36% 29% 24% 7% 4%
    JobKeeper and the extra JobSeeker payments discouraged a lot of people from taking up jobs that were available 55% 20% 23% 32% 24% 11% 10%
    The real problem the government should be addressing isn’t the cost of JobKeeper and JobSeeker but the fact that there aren’t enough decent jobs available 55% 18% 23% 32% 27% 12% 6%
    Ending the supplement to JobSeeker will mean there is more poverty in the community 55% 16% 25% 30% 29% 11% 6%

     

    TOTAL: Agree Total Gender Age Group Federal Voting Intention
    Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ Labor TOTAL: Coalition Greens TOTAL: Other
    I’m worried about how it will affect me 33% 37% 28% 48% 40% 13% 35% 31% 45% 26%
    I’m worried about how it will affect the economy 58% 57% 59% 60% 59% 56% 67% 54% 62% 51%
    There are a lot of businesses which have been surviving only because of JobKeeper and are unlikely to ever return 65% 63% 66% 62% 65% 67% 67% 64% 73% 64%
    The schemes should have been extended at least until the Covid-19 vaccine program is fully rolled out 48% 48% 48% 57% 51% 38% 58% 37% 70% 48%
    The schemes were far too expensive to continue any longer 53% 58% 47% 49% 50% 58% 44% 69% 38% 51%
    Big companies that have made a profit and paid dividends and bonuses should be forced to repay JobKeeper payments they received 66% 69% 62% 57% 66% 73% 68% 67% 67% 67%
    JobKeeper and the extra JobSeeker payments discouraged a lot of people from taking up jobs that were available 55% 58% 53% 51% 54% 60% 51% 65% 45% 53%
    The real problem the government should be addressing isn’t the cost of JobKeeper and JobSeeker but the fact that there aren’t enough decent jobs available 55% 55% 55% 58% 59% 49% 65% 46% 63% 59%
    Ending the supplement to JobSeeker will mean there is more poverty in the community 55% 52% 57% 57% 59% 49% 67% 42% 71% 54%
    Base (n) 1,368 669 699 426 460 482 483 471 123 165
    • When thinking about the end of JobKeeper and the end of the supplement to JobKeeper, most agree that big companies that have made a profit and paid dividends and bonuses should be forced to repay JobKeeper payments they received (66%), and there are a lot of businesses which have been surviving only because of JobKeeper and are unlikely to ever return (65%).
    • This is followed by a large proportion of those who agree that they are worried about how these changes will affect the economy (58%).
    • In general, Australians are less likely to agree that they are worried about how the changes to JobKeeper and JobSeeker will affect themselves (33%) and that the schemes should have been extended at least until the Covid-19 vaccine program is fully rolled out (48%).
    • Older people are more likely to agree the schemes were far too expensive to continue any longer than younger cohorts (58% of those over 55 compared to 50% of those 35-54 and 49% those 18-34) and big companies that have made a profit and paid dividends and bonuses should be forced to repay JobKeeper payments they received (73% of those over 55 compared to 66% of those 35-54 and 57% of those 18-34).
    • Younger people are much more likely to agree that they’re worried about how the changes to the schemes will affect them personally than older cohorts (48% of those 18-34 and 40% of those 35-54 compared to 13% of those over 55). They are also more likely to agree that ending the supplement to JobSeeker will mean there is more poverty in the community (57% of those 18-34 and 59% those 35-54 compared to 49% those over 55).
    • Labor voters and Greens voters are the most likely to agree they’re worried about how it will affect the economy (67% and 62% respectively) compared to 54% of Coalition voters. These voters are also most likely to agree that the real problem the government should be addressing isn’t the cost of JobKeeper and JobSeeker but the fact that there aren’t enough decent jobs available (65% Labor voters and 63% Greens voters, compared to 46% Coalition voters).
    • Coalition supporters are the most likely voters to agree the schemes were far too expensive to continue any longer (69% compared to 44% Labor voters, 38% Greens voters and 51% minor and independent party voters), and JobKeeper and the extra JobSeeker payments discouraged a lot of people from taking up jobs that were available (65% compared to 51% Labor voters, 45% Greens voters and 53% minor and independent party voters).
  • Apr, 2021

    Views towards paid parental leave

    Q. Below are two options for paid parental leave. Which of the two do you think would be better for Australia as a whole?

      Total Gender Age Group Federal Voting Intention Dependent Children
    Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ Labor TOTAL: Coalition Greens TOTAL: Other Have dependent children Do not have dependent children
    Up to 18 weeks for primary carers, plus 2 weeks ‘Dad & Partner pay’. Both are paid at the same rate as the national minimum wage. 40% 45% 35% 30% 35% 53% 36% 48% 27% 37% 36% 42%
    Up to 26 weeks at full pay including super, which can be used by either parent and split between them if they choose. 60% 55% 65% 70% 65% 47% 64% 52% 73% 63% 64% 58%
    Base (n) 1,368 669 699 426 460 482 483 471 123 165 496 872
    • Of the two options for paid parental leave presented, the majority of Australians (60%) think up to 26 weeks at full pay including super, which can be used by either parent and split between them if they choose, would be better for Australia as a whole.
    • 40% think ‘Up to 18 weeks for primary carers, plus 2 weeks ‘Dad & Partner pay’. Both are paid at the same rate as the national minimum wage.’ would be better.
    • Women, those aged 18-34 and 35-54, Greens, Labor and minor and independent party voters, and those with dependent children are the most likely to think the ‘26 weeks’ option would be better for Australia.
  • Mar, 2021

    , , ,

    Performance of Scott Morrison

    Q. Do you approve or disapprove of the job Scott Morrison is doing as Prime Minister?

    29 Mar’21 15 Mar’21 Feb’21 Jan’21 Dec’20 Nov’20
    TOTAL: Approve 57% 62% 65% 61% 62% 66%
    TOTAL: Disapprove 35% 29% 28% 30% 28% 25%
    Don’t know 8% 8% 7% 9% 11% 9%
    Base (n) 1,100 1,124 1,109 1,084 1,071 1,010

     

    TOTAL: Approve 29 Mar’21 15 Mar’21 Feb’21 Jan’21 Dec’20 Nov’20
    Men 65% 65% 65% 62% 68% 65%
    Women 49% 59% 65% 59% 56% 67%
    TOTAL: Disapprove            
    Men 30% 28% 28% 32% 25% 28%
    Women 40% 30% 28% 29% 30% 23%
    • The Prime Minister’s approval rating has dropped to 57% (from 62% earlier in the month) driven by lower approval among women (59% to 49%).
    • Disapproval of the PM among women has increased to 40%, from 30% two weeks ago.
  • Mar, 2021

    , ,

    Women in Politics

    Q. Currently there are 45 (out of 151) federal MPs who are women.

    To what extent to you agree or disagree with the following reasons why there are fewer women than men in parliament.

    TOTAL: Agree Mar’21 Feb’19
    Political parties do not do enough to ensure gender equality in their organisations 63% 57%
    The process used by political parties to select electoral candidates favours men, not women 56% 54%
    Women choose not to get involved with politics 43% 47%
    Voters prefer to elect men, rather than women 40% 39%
    Women are less likely than men to have the experience and skills to make a good politician 20% 20%

     

    TOTAL: Agree Total Gender Age Group Federal Voting Intention
    Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ Labor TOTAL: Coalition Greens TOTAL: Other
    Political parties do not do enough to ensure gender equality in their organisations 63% 58% 68% 66% 61% 62% 71% 59% 75% 56%
    The process used by political parties to select electoral candidates favours men, not women 56% 53% 60% 54% 59% 56% 63% 52% 67% 55%
    Women choose not to get involved with politics 43% 52% 34% 36% 45% 47% 37% 51% 39% 49%
    Voters prefer to elect men, rather than women 40% 43% 36% 52% 40% 29% 37% 46% 39% 41%
    Women are less likely than men to have the experience and skills to make a good politician 20% 28% 12% 23% 23% 13% 16% 27% 17% 19%
    Base (n) 1,100 539 561 332 382 386 382 389 92 122
    • The main barrier to female representation in parliament is seen to be the parties themselves. Almost two-thirds agree that political parties do not do enough to encourage gender equality in their organisations. Agreement with this statement has increased from 57% in 2019. The majority of Coalition (59%), Labor (71%) and Greens voters (75%) all agreed with this statement.
    • Just over half of people (56%) agreed that the selection process is biased towards men.
    • Women are more likely than men to agree that ‘Political parties do not do enough to ensure gender equality in their organisations’ (68% to 58%) and ‘The process used by political parties to select electoral candidates favours men, not women’ (60% to 53%).
    • While men are more likely than women to agree that ‘Women choose not to get involved with politics’ (52% to 34%), ‘Voters prefer to elect men, rather than women’ (43% to 36%) and ‘Women are less likely than men to have the experience and skills to make a good politician’ (28% to 12%).
  • Mar, 2021

    Gender quotas

    Q. To what extent do you support or oppose political parties setting gender quotas when selecting candidates to achieve a representative number of women in parliament?

      Mar’21 Feb’19
    Strongly support 21% 18%
    Somewhat support 27% 29%
    Somewhat oppose 21% 20%
    Strongly oppose 15% 20%
    Unsure 16% 14%
    TOTAL: Support 48% 46%
    TOTAL: Oppose 36% 40%
    Base (n) 1,100 1,101

     

      Total Gender Age Group Federal Voting Intention
    Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ Labor TOTAL: Coalition Greens TOTAL: Other  
    Strongly support 21% 21% 20% 23% 26% 13% 22% 19% 40% 19%  
    Somewhat support 27% 28% 27% 33% 25% 25% 32% 29% 27% 22%  
    Somewhat oppose 21% 23% 19% 16% 19% 26% 21% 24% 13% 22%  
    Strongly oppose 15% 17% 12% 10% 14% 19% 10% 19% 4% 24%  
    Unsure 16% 11% 21% 18% 15% 16% 15% 9% 16% 14%  
    TOTAL: Support 48% 49% 47% 56% 52% 38% 54% 48% 67% 40%  
    TOTAL: Oppose 36% 40% 31% 26% 33% 46% 31% 43% 17% 46%  
    Base (n) 1,100 539 561 332 382 386 382 389 92 122  
    • Support for the introduction of gender quotas for candidate selection is unchanged from 2019 at 46% (48% in 2019).
    • 48% of Coalition party voters support the introduction of quotas, 43% oppose and 9% are unsure.
  • Mar, 2021

    , , ,

    Views towards workplace culture and treatment of women in Parliament House

    Q. Following allegations of sexual assault and misogynistic behaviour by staffers, a review into Parliament House workplace culture has been initiated.

    Which of the following is closest to your view on the issue?

      Total Gender Age Group Federal Voting Intention
    Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ Labor TOTAL: Coalition Greens TOTAL: Other
    Recent revelations about the culture in Parliament House is an isolated workplace issue, primarily about the safety of women working in politics 40% 50% 30% 47% 44% 29% 30% 52% 30% 41%
    Recent revelations about the culture in Parliament House are symptomatic of the discrimination of women in society 60% 50% 70% 53% 56% 71% 70% 48% 70% 59%
    Base (n) 1,100 539 561 332 382 386 382 389 92 122
    • More people believe that the allegations of sexual assault and misogynistic culture in Parliament House is a wider society issue, than isolated to Federal politics (60% to 40%).
    • This view was more strongly held by women than Men (70% to 50%).
    • Labor and Greens voters were more likely to think the culture is shared by society (both 70%), while Coalition voters were more likely to believe the issues are isolated to politics (52%).
  • Mar, 2021

    Action to address gender inequality in Australia

    Q. To what extent do you support or oppose the following measures to address gender inequality in Australia?

      TOTAL: Support TOTAL: Oppose Strongly support Somewhat support Neither support, nor oppose Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose
    Organise a national summit of all state and federal leaders to set targets and policies to reduce violence and sexual assault 69% 9% 37% 32% 22% 4% 4%
    Implement the recommendations of the respect@work inquiry 68% 8% 33% 34% 24% 5% 4%
    Establish a specialist sexual assault court 62% 13% 30% 31% 25% 8% 6%
    Universal access to free child-care and early learning for families with young children 60% 16% 30% 30% 24% 9% 8%

     

    TOTAL: Support Total Gender Age Group Federal Voting Intention
    Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ Labor TOTAL: Coalition Greens TOTAL: Other
    Organise a national summit of all state and federal leaders to set targets and policies to reduce violence and sexual assault 69% 65% 73% 68% 68% 71% 76% 68% 70% 63%
    Implement the recommendations of the respect@work inquiry 68% 62% 73% 64% 69% 70% 74% 65% 80% 59%
    Establish a specialist sexual assault court 62% 53% 70% 64% 64% 58% 67% 58% 74% 56%
    Base (n) 1,100 539 561 332 382 386 382 389 92 122
    • There is majority support for all of the proposed steps to address gender inequality in Australia including a national summit to reduce violence and sexual assault (69% support), implement the recommendations of the respect@work inquiry (68%) and the establishment of a specialist sexual assault court (62%).
    • In all cases women were more likely than men to support making the changes. Still, over half of men support making changes.
Error: