The Essential Report Archive Read the latest report

  • Nov, 2016

    Donald Trump Attributes

    Q. Which of the following describe your opinion of the Republican American Presidential nominee, Donald Trump?

      Yes No Don’t know
    Intelligent 30% 56% 14%
    Hard-working 38% 45% 17%
    A capable leader 15% 71% 14%
    Understands the problems facing America 22% 62% 17%
    Visionary 19% 67% 14%
    Good in a crisis 13% 66% 21%
    Superficial 71% 15% 14%
    More honest than most politicians 20% 66% 14%
    Trustworthy 9% 77% 14%
    Narrow-minded 75% 13% 12%
    Arrogant 85% 7% 8%
    Out of touch with ordinary people 67% 19% 14%
    Intolerant 74% 13% 13%
    Aggressive 83% 8% 9%
    Erratic 78% 10% 13%
    Someone who will strengthen the US relationship with Australia 11% 71% 18%

    The most common attributes for Donald Trump were seen to be:

    • Arrogant (85%)
    • Aggressive (83%)
    • Erratic (78%)
    • Narrow-minded (75%)
    • Superficial (71%)

    38% or less of Australians agreed that each of the positive attributes described Donald Trump. In terms of positive attributes the most commonly agreed with were ‘hard-working’ (38%) and ‘intelligent’ (30%); however far more disagreed than agreed that these attributed describes Donald Trump.

    Just 11% believe that Donald Trump is ‘someone who will strengthen the US relationship with Australia’.

  • Nov, 2016

    Hillary Clinton Attributes

    Q. Which of the following describe your opinion of the Democratic American Presidential nominee, Hillary Clinton?

      Yes No Don’t know
    Intelligent 74% 13% 13%
    Hard-working 71% 14% 15%
    A capable leader 60% 21% 19%
    Understands the problems facing American 57% 25% 18%
    Visionary 39% 39% 23%
    Good in a crisis 54% 20% 26%
    Superficial 31% 51% 18%
    More honest than most politicians 24% 51% 25%
    Trustworthy 33% 42% 25%
    Narrow-minded 22% 60% 18%
    Arrogant 33% 54% 13%
    Out of touch with ordinary people 34% 47% 20%
    Intolerant 20% 61% 19%
    Aggressive 28% 57% 14%
    Erratic 20% 64% 16%
    Someone who will strengthen the US relationship with Australia 53% 21% 26%

    The most common attributes for Hillary Clinton were seen to be:

    • Intelligent (74%)
    • Hard-working (71%)
    • A capable leader (60%)
    • Understands the problems facing America (57%)
    • Good in a crisis (54%)

    33% or less of Australians agreed that each of the negative attributes described Hillary Clinton.

    In terms of negative attributes the most commonly agreed with were ‘out of touch with ordinary people’ (34%) and ‘arrogant’ (33%), however far more disagreed than agreed that these attributes described Hillary Clinton.

    Over half (53%) believe that Hillary Clinton is ‘someone who will strengthen the US relationship with Australia’.

  • Nov, 2016

    Gun Laws

    Q. Do you think Australian gun ownership laws are too strong, not strong enough or about right?

      Total   Vote Labor Vote Lib/Nat Vote Greens Vote other   July 2015
    Too strong 6%   6% 5% 15%   6%
    Not strong enough 44%   47% 49% 47% 39%   45%
    About right 45%   44% 43% 48% 43%   40%
    Don’t know 5%   4% 3% 5% 2%   10%

    While 45% of Australians think that our gun ownership laws are ‘about right’, almost the same amount (44%) think that they are ‘not strong enough’.

    These results replicate those from July 2015.

    The results are consistent across voting groups, however ‘other’ voters are slightly more likely than the average to think that gun ownership laws are ‘too strong’. However even amongst these voters the largest proportion say they are ‘about right’ (43%).

  • Nov, 2016

    Funding home purchases

    Q. Have you ever lent to or borrowed from money to any of the following people to purchase a home?

      Have lent to Have borrowed from
    Your parents 9% 19%
    Your grandparents 3% 4%
    Other relatives 9% 6%
    Your children 11% 3%
    Friends 11% 6%
    Your employer 1% 4%

    Just over one in ten (11%) Australians have lent money to their children or their friends to enable them to purchase a home. Just under one in 10 (9%) have lent to their parents or other relatives.

    Almost one in five Australians (19%) have borrowed from their parents.

  • Nov, 2016

    Phasing out live exports

    Q. Would you support or oppose phasing out live exports to other countries?

      Total   Vote Labor Vote Lib/Nat Vote Greens Vote other
    TOTAL Support 44%   47% 38% 66% 49%
    TOTAL Oppose 29%   28% 34% 12% 30%
    Strongly support 19%   21% 13% 33% 26%
    Support 25%   26% 25% 33% 23%
    Oppose 21%   20% 25% 11% 20%
    Strongly oppose 8%   8% 9% 1% 10%
    Don’t know 27%   25% 28% 22% 22%

    Almost half (44%) of Australians support the phasing out of live exports to other countries. Just 29% oppose this.

    Greens voters (66%) were more likely to support this. Lib/Nat (38%) were less likely.

    There were no significant differences based on age or gender.

  • Nov, 2016

    View of live exports

    Q. Thinking about the export of live animals for slaughter, which of the following statements is closest to your view?

      Total   Vote Labor Vote Lib/Nat Vote Greens Vote other
    Australia should not export live sheep and cattle to any country at all 30%   34% 22% 48% 38%
    Australia should only export live sheep and cattle to countries which guarantee they will be treated humanely 50%   49% 57% 46% 44%
    Australia should export live sheep and cattle to any country that wants them 9%   9% 11% 2% 11%
    Don’t know 11%   8% 10% 5% 7%

    From the statements offered, half of Australians selected ‘Australia should only export live sheep and cattle to countries which guarantee they will be treated humanely’ as the statement closest to their view.

    A further 30% thought ‘Australia should not export live sheep and cattle to any country at all’.

    Greens voters were more likely to select ‘Australia should not export live sheep and cattle to any country at all’ (48%).

    There were no significant differences based on age or gender.

  • Oct, 2016

    Federal voting intention

    Q. If a Federal Election was held today to which party will you probably give your first preference vote? If not sure, which party are you currently leaning toward? If don’t know – Well which party are you currently leaning to?

      Total   Last week

    11/10/16

    2 weeks ago

    4/10/16

    4 weeks ago

    20/9/16

      Election 2 Jul 16
    Liberal 36%   34% 34% 36%    
    National 3%   3% 3% 3%    
    Total Liberal/National 38%   37% 38% 39%   42.0%
    Labor 37%   37% 36% 36%   34.7%
    Greens 10%   11% 10% 9%   10.2%
    Nick Xenophon Team 3%   3% 3% 3%    
    Pauline Hanson’s One Nation 6%   5% 6% 6%    
    Other/Independent 6%   6% 7% 7%   13.1%
    2 party preferred              
    Liberal National 48%   47% 48% 48%   50.4%
    Labor 52%   53% 52% 52%   49.6%

     

    1. Sample = 1783 The data in the above tables comprise 2-week averages derived from the first preference/leaning to voting questions. Respondents who select ‘don’t know’ are not included in the results. The two-party preferred estimate is calculated by distributing the votes of the other parties according to their preferences at the 2016 election.
  • Oct, 2016

    Concern about the risk of terrorism in Australia

    Q. How concerned are you about the risk of a terrorism attack on Australian soil?

      Total   Vote Labor Vote Lib/Nat Vote Greens Vote other
    TOTAL Concern 72%   74% 80% 42% 76%
    Very concerned 24%   23% 28% 2% 33%
    Somewhat concerned 48%   51% 52% 40% 43%
    Not very concerned 19%   20% 15% 39% 17%
    Not at all concerned 6%   5% 4% 19% 7%
    Don’t know 3%   1% 1% 0% 1%

     

    Almost three quarters of Australians (72%) are concerned about the risk of a terrorism attack on Australian soil. 24% of those are ‘very’ concerned.

    Greens voters (42%) are less likely than Labor (74%), Lib/Nat (80%) or Other voters (76%) to be concerned.

    Older Australians were more likely to be concerned; 81% of those aged 55+ compared to 71% of those aged 35-54 and 63% of those aged 34 and under were concerned.

    There were no significant differences between males and females.

Error: