30 July 2012, 300712, capped funding, funding education, students
Q. The Gonski report on funding education has recommended a new model for school funding that would mean all students are entitled to a set level of funding regardless of where they go to school, disadvantaged schools receive more funding and taxpayer funding for private schools is adjusted down based on parents’ capacity to pay.
Do you support or oppose these recommendations?
Total 27 Feb 12 |
Total 30 Jul 12 |
Vote Labor |
Vote Lib/Nat |
Vote Greens |
|
Total support |
68% |
65% |
71% |
59% |
83% |
Total oppose |
13% |
14% |
14% |
20% |
2% |
Strongly support |
25% |
25% |
34% |
16% |
47% |
Support |
43% |
40% |
37% |
43% |
36% |
Oppose |
9% |
10% |
10% |
14% |
2% |
Strongly oppose |
4% |
4% |
4% |
6% |
– |
Don’t know |
19% |
20% |
14% |
21% |
15% |
65% say they support the recommendations of the Gonski report on funding education and 14% were opposed. Support has weakened very slightly (-3%) since this question was asked in February after the release of the Gonski Report.
Strongest support was shown by Labor voters (71%), Greens voters (83%) and people aged 55+ (70%).
Education, education funding, Gonski report, Polling, polls, school funding, Schools, students, taxpayers
Q. The Gonski report on funding education has recommended a new model for school funding that would mean all students are entitled to a set level of funding regardless of where they go to school, disadvantaged schools receive more funding and taxpayer funding for private schools is adjusted down based on parents’ capacity to pay.
Do you support or oppose these recommendations?
Total |
Vote Labor |
Vote Lib/Nat |
Vote Greens |
|
Total support |
68% |
79% |
64% |
76% |
Total oppose |
13% |
7% |
17% |
14% |
Strongly support |
25% |
37% |
17% |
35% |
Support |
43% |
42% |
47% |
41% |
Oppose |
9% |
5% |
12% |
9% |
Strongly oppose |
4% |
2% |
5% |
5% |
Don’t know |
19% |
14% |
19% |
10 |
68% say they support the recommendations of the Gonski report on funding education and 13% were opposed.
Strongest support was shown by Labor voters (79%), Greens voters (76%) and people aged 55+ (75%).
corporate interests, Essential Media, Essential Report, ethnic communities, federal politics, generation, Greens, indigenous, Labor, Liberal, Nationals, pensioners, Polling, polls, regional, rural, self-employed, small business, students, voter interests, welfare, working families
Q. Which political party do you think best represents the interests of –
Labor | Liberal | Greens | Don’t know | |
Families with young children | 34% | 31% | 5% | 29% |
Students | 30% | 28% | 10% | 33% |
Working people on average incomes | 40% | 32% | 5% | 23% |
Working people on low incomes | 43% | 27% | 6% | 24% |
Working people on high incomes | 13% | 63% | 2% | 22% |
People on welfare | 38% | 23% | 8% | 30% |
Pensioners | 33% | 28% | 5% | 34% |
Small businesses and self-employed | 20% | 47% | 4% | 29% |
Big business | 13% | 62% | 2% | 23% |
The next generation of Australians | 19% | 31% | 17% | 33% |
Indigenous people | 23% | 21% | 16% | 40% |
Ethnic communities | 22% | 21% | 15% | 42% |
Rural and regional Australians | 18% | 34% | 11% | 36% |
The Labor Party is considered the party which best represents the interests of working people on low and average incomes, people on welfare and pensioners. The Liberal Party is considered best at representing the interests of people on high incomes, big business, small business and self-employed, rural and regional Australians and the next generation. The Greens’ main strengths are in representing the next generation, indigenous people and ethnic communities.
There was little difference between the major parties in terms of representing the interests of families with young children, students, indigenous people and ethnic communities.