The Essential Report Archive Read the latest report

  • Jun, 2020

    , , , ,

    Agreement with removal of monuments and memorials

    Q. Protesters are arguing for the removal of monuments and memorials of individuals or organisations connected to the slave trade, genocide of Indigenous Australians and racism. In some cases, the protesters have destroyed the monuments and memorials themselves.

    To what extent do you agree or disagree with these statements about removing public monuments and memorials?

      NET: Agree NET: Disagree Strongly agree Somewhat agree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree Unsure
    The protesters should focus on making changes for people living now, rather than things that happened in the past 80% 14% 54% 26% 8% 6% 7%
    Instead of removing monuments and memorials, we should include more information about the historical context of public figures 78% 15% 47% 30% 10% 5% 7%
    Every public figure has their positive and negative aspects, and this isn’t a good reason to remove their monuments or memorials 76% 16% 45% 31% 9% 7% 8%
    We lose part of our history when monuments and memorials are removed 76% 17% 49% 27% 8% 8% 8%
    It’s wrong to judge historical figures by our modern standards of morality 72% 19% 44% 28% 11% 8% 9%
    Monuments and memorials provide a constant reminder of racial discrimination in society 48% 42% 19% 29% 20% 21% 11%
    Monuments and memorials of people who support racism, segregation or slavery glorify their actions 45% 41% 19% 26% 22% 19% 14%

     

    NET: Agree Total Federal Voting Intention
    Labor Coalition Greens TOTAL: Other
    The protesters should focus on making changes for people living now, rather than things that happened in the past 80% 77% 89% 61% 83%
    Instead of removing monuments and memorials, we should include more information about the historical context of public figures 78% 75% 85% 62% 81%
    Every public figure has their positive and negative aspects, and this isn’t a good reason to remove their monuments or memorials 76% 71% 87% 52% 79%
    We lose part of our history when monuments and memorials are removed 76% 71% 88% 54% 71%
    It’s wrong to judge historical figures by our modern standards of morality 72% 65% 83% 55% 74%
    Monuments and memorials provide a constant reminder of racial discrimination in society 48% 55% 38% 69% 43%
    Monuments and memorials of people who support racism, segregation or slavery glorify their actions 45% 50% 37% 65% 41%
    Base (n) 1,079 315 445 107 108
    •  Four-fifths of participants agree protesters should focus on making changes for people living now, rather than things that happened in the past (80%) while another 78% agree that instead of removing monuments and memorials, we should include more information about the historical context of public figures.
    • Less than half of participants agree that monuments and memorials provide a constant reminder of racial discrimination in society (48%) and monuments and memorials of people who support racism, segregation or slavery glorify their actions (45%).
    • 18-34 year olds are more likely than those over 55, to agree that monuments and memorials of people who support racism, segregation or slavery glorify their actions (58% of 18-34 year olds and 35% of 55+) or agree that monuments and memorials provide a constant reminder of racial discrimination in society (58% and 37% respectively).
    • Participants over 55 are more likely to agree that we lose part of our history when monuments and memorials are removed (87% of those aged 55+ and 64% of 18-34) and it’s wrong to judge historical figures by our modern standards of morality (80% of 55+ and 64% of 18-34).
    • Broadly Greens voters are most likely to agree with negative statements about the impact of these monuments, while Coalition voters are least likely to agree with those statements.
  • Nov, 2019

    , , ,

    Protest Activity

    Q. Have you personally ever taken part in any of the following…?

      Total Gender Age
    Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+
    Signed an online petition 44% 39% 48% 45% 44% 42%
    Signed a written petition 39% 37% 41% 33% 34% 50%
    Attended a march or rally 17% 18% 16% 24% 12% 16%
    Gone on strike from work 13% 18% 8% 13% 10% 14%
    Signed up to an online political campaign 10% 11% 10% 16% 9% 7%
    None of these 37% 39% 35% 31% 41% 39%
    NET: Any of these 63% 61% 65% 69% 59% 61%
    Base (n) 1,075 526 549 327 371 377
    • Almost two-thirds (63%) of people have ever participated in a protest activity – either attending a strike or rally, or signing up to a petition or campaign.
    • Signing online and written petitions are the most popular forms of protest (44% and 39% respectively have done this). Less than a fifth have ever a march or rally (17%) and 13% have been on strike.
    • Women are more likely than men to have signed petitions (48% to 39% for online petitions and 41% to 37% for written petitions), while men are more likely to have been on strike (18% to 8%).
    • People aged 18-34 are more likely than other to have attended a protest or rally (24% compared to 14% of those aged 35+).
    Total Voting Intention
    Labor Coalition Greens NET: Other
    Signed an online petition 44% 43% 37% 71% 59%
    Signed a written petition 39% 37% 39% 51% 50%
    Attended a march or rally 17% 16% 13% 43% 21%
    Gone on strike from work 13% 17% 10% 12% 12%
    Signed up to an online political campaign 10% 11% 9% 18% 13%
    None of these 37% 38% 39% 18% 31%
    NET: Any of these 63% 62% 61% 82% 69%
    Base (n) 1,075 325 377 107 155
    • Greens voters are most likely to have participated in any activity (82%), with signing online petitions (71%), written petitions (51%) and attending marches or rallies (43%) being most popular.
    • Those with a university education are more likely to have participated in protest activities are (69% to 60% of all others). They are more likely to have attended a march or rally (24% to 14%), gone on strike (18% to 10%) and signed up to an online campaign (16% to 8%).
  • Nov, 2019

    ,

    Support for Right to Protest laws

    Q. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements regarding the right to protest in Australia?

      NET: Agree NET: Disagree Strongly agree Somewhat agree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree Unsure
    The right to peaceful protest is a fundamental part of a democratic society 82% 10% 51% 31% 7% 3% 9%
    Government has the right to limit citizen protests when it disrupts businesses 58% 31% 26% 32% 17% 15% 11%
    Protestors should have the right to pressure banks not to invest in companies that are building coal mines 53% 33% 23% 30% 18% 15% 14%
    Government has the right to limit citizen protests when it is contrary to the national interest 47% 41% 20% 28% 22% 19% 12%
    • A large majority of people agree that the right to peaceful protest is a fundamental part of a democratic society (82%), with half (51%) strongly agreeing.
    • 58% agree that the Government has the right to limit citizen protests when it disrupts businesses (31% disagree), and 53% agree that protestors should have the right to pressure banks not to invest in companies that are building coal mines (33% disagree).
    • Agreement was split for the statement ‘Government has the right to limit citizen protests when it is contrary to the national interest’ with 47% agreeing, and 41% disagreeing.
    NET: AGREE Total Gender Age
    Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+
    The right to peaceful protest is a fundamental part of a democratic society 82% 84% 79% 75% 83% 86%
    Government has the right to limit citizen protests when it disrupts businesses 58% 60% 56% 54% 58% 62%
    Protestors should have the right to pressure banks not to invest in companies that are building coal mines 53% 54% 52% 60% 52% 48%
    Government has the right to limit citizen protests when it is contrary to the national interest 47% 50% 45% 41% 48% 52%
    Base (n) 1,075 526 549 327 371 377
    • Older respondents (those aged over 55) were more likely than younger people (18-34) to agree that the right to peaceful protest is a fundamental part of a democratic society (86% to 75%), that the Government has the right to limit citizen protests when it disrupts businesses (62% to 54%), and that the Government has the right to limit citizen protests when it is contrary to the national interest (52% to 41%).
    • Over 55s are less likely to agree that protestors should have the right to pressure banks not to invest in companies that are building coal mines (60% to 48%).
    NET: AGREE Total Voting Intention Protest Activity
    Labor Coalition Greens NET: Other Participated in protest activity Not participated in protest activity
    The right to peaceful protest is a fundamental part of a democratic society 82% 84% 86% 89% 85% 87% 72%
    Government has the right to limit citizen protests when it disrupts businesses 58% 48% 78% 33% 61% 58% 59%
    Protestors should have the right to pressure banks not to invest in companies that are building coal mines 53% 60% 47% 80% 49% 60% 41%
    Government has the right to limit citizen protests when it is contrary to the national interest 47% 39% 65% 22% 49% 47% 49%
    Base (n) 1,075 325 377 107 155 682 393
    • Coalition voters were most likely to agree that the Government has the right to limit citizen protests when it disrupts businesses (78%) and that the Government has the right to limit citizen protests when it is contrary to the national interest (65%). However they were least likely to agree that protestors should have the right to pressure banks not to invest in companies that are building coal mines (47%).
    • Those who have participated in a protest activity are more likely than those who have not to agree with the statements ‘The right to peaceful protest is a fundamental part of a democratic society’ (87% to 72%) and ‘Protestors should have the right to pressure banks not to invest in companies that are building coal mines oppose the proposed changes’ (46% to 27%).
  • Nov, 2019

    , ,

    Support for Right to Protest laws

    Q. Scott Morrison has flagged changing the law to stop environmental and other civil society groups or consumers campaigning against big resource projects. This change could make consumer or environmental boycotts illegal.

    Based on what you understand, to what extent do you support or oppose the Prime Minister’s proposal?

        Gender Age
      Total Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+
    Strongly support 14% 18% 11% 12% 11% 19%
    Somewhat support 19% 20% 18% 23% 16% 18%
    Neither support, nor oppose 28% 24% 31% 29% 33% 22%
    Somewhat oppose 15% 13% 17% 12% 18% 15%
    Strongly oppose 24% 25% 23% 24% 22% 26%
    NET: Support 33% 38% 29% 35% 27% 37%
    NET: Oppose 39% 38% 40% 36% 40% 41%
    Base (n) 1,075 526 549 327 371 377
    • Overall, there was more opposition to support for the Government’s proposals stop environmental and other civil society groups or consumers campaigning against big resource projects (39% to 33%). 28% neither support nor oppose the proposals.
    • Support was highest among men (38%) and those aged 55+ (37%).
      Total Voting Intention Protest Activity
    Labor Coalition Greens NET: Other Participated in protest activity Not participated in protest activity
    Strongly support 14% 9% 26% 1% 11% 15% 13%
    Somewhat support 19% 15% 30% 11% 13% 16% 23%
    Neither support, nor oppose 28% 27% 24% 13% 30% 22% 37%
    Somewhat oppose 15% 17% 12% 18% 18% 16% 14%
    Strongly oppose 24% 32% 8% 57% 29% 31% 13%
    NET: Support 33% 24% 56% 12% 23% 31% 36%
    NET: Oppose 39% 49% 20% 76% 47% 46% 27%
    Base (n) 1,075 325 377 107 155 682 393
    • Just over half of Coalition voters support the Government’s proposals (56%). The proposal receives lower support among Labor (24%), Greens (12%), and minor party/independent voters (23%).
    • Those who have participated in a protest activity are more likely than those who have not to oppose the proposed changes (46% to 27%).
  • Jul, 2015

    ,

    Right to protest

    Q. Do you think it should be legal or illegal to stage a protest in the following places?

    Legal

    Illegal

    Don’t know

    Vote Labor

    Vote Lib/Nat

    Vote Greens

    Vote Other

    Outside Parliament House

    72%

    15%

    12%

    78%

    67%

    89%

    80%

    On a city street

    71%

    16%

    14%

    74%

    68%

    87%

    74%

    Outside a private business

    49%

    33%

    18%

    58%

    39%

    69%

    59%

    At a train station

    43%

    41%

    16%

    49%

    36%

    65%

    47%

    Outside a church

    42%

    41%

    17%

    48%

    32%

    70%

    45%

    Outside a public figure’s house (i.e. politician or celebrity)

    34%

    50%

    16%

    38%

    25%

    50%

    43%

    Outside a school

    32%

    54%

    15%

    35%

    25%

    50%

    39%

    Outside a medical clinic that offers abortion procedures

    30%

    54%

    17%

    31%

    26%

    37%

    39%

    Inside Parliament House

    25%

    59%

    16%

    30%

    16%

    39%

    27%

    A majority think it should be legal to stage a protest outside Parliament House (72%) and on a city street (71%). Respondents were also more likely to think protesting outside a private business should be legal (49%).

    However, a majority think that it should be illegal to stage a protest inside Parliament House (59%), outside a clinic that offers abortions (54%), outside a school (54%) and outside a public figure’s house (50%).

Error: