Essential Report
Agreement with removal of monuments and memorials
Q. Protesters are arguing for the removal of monuments and memorials of individuals or organisations connected to the slave trade, genocide of Indigenous Australians and racism. In some cases, the protesters have destroyed the monuments and memorials themselves.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with these statements about removing public monuments and memorials?
NET: Agree | NET: Disagree | Strongly agree | Somewhat agree | Somewhat disagree | Strongly disagree | Unsure | |
The protesters should focus on making changes for people living now, rather than things that happened in the past | 80% | 14% | 54% | 26% | 8% | 6% | 7% |
Instead of removing monuments and memorials, we should include more information about the historical context of public figures | 78% | 15% | 47% | 30% | 10% | 5% | 7% |
Every public figure has their positive and negative aspects, and this isn’t a good reason to remove their monuments or memorials | 76% | 16% | 45% | 31% | 9% | 7% | 8% |
We lose part of our history when monuments and memorials are removed | 76% | 17% | 49% | 27% | 8% | 8% | 8% |
It’s wrong to judge historical figures by our modern standards of morality | 72% | 19% | 44% | 28% | 11% | 8% | 9% |
Monuments and memorials provide a constant reminder of racial discrimination in society | 48% | 42% | 19% | 29% | 20% | 21% | 11% |
Monuments and memorials of people who support racism, segregation or slavery glorify their actions | 45% | 41% | 19% | 26% | 22% | 19% | 14% |
NET: Agree | Total | Federal Voting Intention | |||
Labor | Coalition | Greens | TOTAL: Other | ||
The protesters should focus on making changes for people living now, rather than things that happened in the past | 80% | 77% | 89% | 61% | 83% |
Instead of removing monuments and memorials, we should include more information about the historical context of public figures | 78% | 75% | 85% | 62% | 81% |
Every public figure has their positive and negative aspects, and this isn’t a good reason to remove their monuments or memorials | 76% | 71% | 87% | 52% | 79% |
We lose part of our history when monuments and memorials are removed | 76% | 71% | 88% | 54% | 71% |
It’s wrong to judge historical figures by our modern standards of morality | 72% | 65% | 83% | 55% | 74% |
Monuments and memorials provide a constant reminder of racial discrimination in society | 48% | 55% | 38% | 69% | 43% |
Monuments and memorials of people who support racism, segregation or slavery glorify their actions | 45% | 50% | 37% | 65% | 41% |
Base (n) | 1,079 | 315 | 445 | 107 | 108 |
- Four-fifths of participants agree protesters should focus on making changes for people living now, rather than things that happened in the past (80%) while another 78% agree that instead of removing monuments and memorials, we should include more information about the historical context of public figures.
- Less than half of participants agree that monuments and memorials provide a constant reminder of racial discrimination in society (48%) and monuments and memorials of people who support racism, segregation or slavery glorify their actions (45%).
- 18-34 year olds are more likely than those over 55, to agree that monuments and memorials of people who support racism, segregation or slavery glorify their actions (58% of 18-34 year olds and 35% of 55+) or agree that monuments and memorials provide a constant reminder of racial discrimination in society (58% and 37% respectively).
- Participants over 55 are more likely to agree that we lose part of our history when monuments and memorials are removed (87% of those aged 55+ and 64% of 18-34) and it’s wrong to judge historical figures by our modern standards of morality (80% of 55+ and 64% of 18-34).
- Broadly Greens voters are most likely to agree with negative statements about the impact of these monuments, while Coalition voters are least likely to agree with those statements.

COVID-19 RESEARCH
Read Essential's ongoing research on the public response to Covid-19.
Essential Report
In this week's report:
- Performance of Scott Morrison
- Performance of Anthony Albanese
- Preferred Prime Minister
- Views towards re-electing the federal Coalition government
- Party trust to handle issues
- Importance of Australia’s international reputation
- Scott Morrison’s impact on Australia’s international reputation
- Views towards Australia’s international reputation
Sign up for updates
Receive the Essential Report in your inbox.Essential Tags
2PP
Abbott
ALP
Anthony Albanese
Approval of opposition leader
Approval of Tony Abbott
asylum seekers
Australian economy
Bill Shorten
Carbon Tax
climate change
coronavirus
covid-19
economy
Education
Election
EMC
environment
ER
Essential Media
Essential Report
Federal Budget
Federal Government
federal politics
Gillard
Greens
Julia Gillard
kevin rudd
Labor
Labor Party
Liberal
Liberal Party
Liberals
mining
Nationals
Opposition leader
peter lewis
Polling
polls
Prime Minister
Scott Morrison
tony abbott
two party preferred
voting
Voting intention
Recent Comments
