The Essential Report Archive Read the latest report

  • Oct, 2021

    , , , ,

    Federal government’s role in increasing employment and jobs

    Q. Which of the following is closer to your view of the federal government’s role in relation to employment and jobs?

      Total Gender Age Group Federal Voting Intention
    Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ Labor TOTAL: Coalition Greens TOTAL: Other
    The federal government’s role is to reduce taxes and red tape so businesses can employ more workers 35% 42% 29% 34% 35% 36% 30% 44% 31% 38%
    The federal government’s role is to invest behind local industries to create more jobs 44% 44% 43% 40% 43% 47% 49% 42% 48% 46%
    Unsure 21% 14% 28% 26% 22% 18% 21% 14% 21% 16%
    Base (n) 1,781 875 906 533 601 647 636 610 157 220
    • More people think the federal government’s role is to invest behind local industries to create more jobs than to reduce taxes and red tape so businesses can employ more workers (44% to 35%). 21% are unsure on their preferred role.
    • Men are more likely than women to think the federal government’s role is to reduce taxes and red tape so businesses can employ more workers (42% to 29%).
    • Coalition voters are also more likely to agree with this viewpoint than all other voters combined (44% to 32% respectively).
  • Sep, 2012

    , , , , , , , , , ,

    Do we undervalue our public sector innovations?


    Nadine Flood questions whether governments take our science and other publicly funded breakthroughs for granted.

    The CSIRO is one of Australia’s most respected institutions. The Bureau of Meteorology is crucial in times of impending climate crisis. They are also part of the public service. And though their specialty is science, other areas of the public sector are also responsible for innovation — from agricultural land use to new ways of fighting tax evasion.

    See a brief history of CSIRO achievements from wi-fi to dollar notes.

    It’s a concept that is often lost at Budget time when governments keen to trim down costs often take a knife to the public sector. It’s easy pickings if the millions of dollars saved or made by innovations in technology, energy and health fail to be counted as assets.

    The CPSU’s Nadine Flood tells 3Q how the CSIRO’s development of wi-fi technology transformed the world and brought $500 million into Australia through patent fees. Yet if the Opposition has its way, crucial funding of the sciences and other public sector innovation would be lost.
    Further cuts on the grounds of “efficiency” will have long term effects on our ability to innovate.

Error: