The Essential Report Archive Read the latest report

  • Apr, 2018

    Coal vs renewables

    Q. Which of the following statements is closest to your view? 

      Total   Vote Labor Vote Lib/Nat Vote Greens Vote other   Jul 2015
    Governments should prioritise support for the coal industry over the renewable energy industry 13%   13% 19% 3% 15%   6%
    Government should prioritise support for the renewable energy industry over the coal industry 37%   46% 29% 67% 26%   50%
    The Government should treat both industries equally 35%   29% 46% 22% 48%   28%
    Don’t know 15%   12% 7% 8% 12%   15%

     

     

    37% (down 13% since July 2015) of respondents agree more with the statement that the Government should prioritise support for the renewable energy industry over the coal industry and only 13% (up 7%)  think they should prioritise coal over renewables. 35% (up 7%) think they should treat both industries equally.

     

    Those most likely to think the Government should give priority to renewable energy were Greens voters (67%), Labor voters (46%) and respondents with university education (50%).

  • Mar, 2018

    Federal voting intention

    If a Federal Election was held today to which party will you probably give your first preference vote? If not sure, which party are you currently leaning toward? If don’t know – Well which party are you currently leaning to?

      Total   2 weeks ago 13/3/18 4 weeks ago 27/2/18   Election  2 Jul 16
    Liberal 35% 33% 32%
    National 3% 3% 3%
    Total Liberal/National 38%   36% 35%   42.0%
    Labor 36%   38% 35%   34.7%
    Greens 9% 9% 10% 10.2%
    Nick Xenophon Team 2% 3% 2%
    Pauline Hanson’s One Nation 8% 8% 8%
    Other/Independent 7% 7% 10% 13.1%
    2 party preferred
    Liberal National 48%   46% 47%   50.4%
    Labor 52%   54% 53%   49.6%

    Respondents who select ‘don’t know’ are not included in the results. The two-party preferred estimate is calculated by distributing the votes of the other parties according to their preferences at the 2016 election.

  • Mar, 2018

    Understanding of franking credits

    How much do you know and understand about dividend imputation and franking credits?

      Total   Men Women Aged 18-34 Aged 35-54 Aged 55+ Less than $600

    pw

    $600-1,000 pw $1,000-1,500 pw $1,500-2,000 pw More than $2,000 pw
    A lot 7% 10% 4% 9% 5% 8% 4% 5% 8% 10% 11%
    A fair amount 14% 18% 11% 13% 12% 18% 9% 10% 17% 14% 19%
    A little 22% 25% 18% 17% 21% 27% 18% 21% 22% 22% 25%
    Heard of them but don’t know anything about them 27% 24% 29% 19% 32% 29% 290% 32% 25% 29% 20%
    Never heard of them 30%   22% 38% 42% 30% 18% 39% 32% 28% 26% 24%

    Only about one in five respondents said they knew much about dividend imputation and franking credits – 7% said they knew a lot and 14% a fair amount. 30% said they had never heard of them and 27% had heard of them but don’t know anything about them.

    Those most likely to know a lot or a fair amount were incomes over $2,000pw (30%), aged 65+ (30%) and university educated (33%).

  • Mar, 2018

    Whether receive franking credits

    When companies pay dividends to Australian shareholders out of after-tax profit, shareholders receive franking credits, which they can claim as a tax deduction. If the shareholder does not pay any tax, they receive a cash refund from the tax office. This system is known as “dividend imputation” and these cash payments cost the Government about $6 billion per year. Do you personally receive a tax deduction or a cash payment for franking credits?

      Total   Men Women Aged 18-34 Aged 35-54 Aged 55+ Less than $600

    pw

    $600-1,000 pw $1,000-1,500 pw $1,500-2,000 pw More than $2,000 pw
    Yes, receive a tax deduction 16% 20% 12% 18% 15% 15% 3% 10% 17% 19% 29%
    Yes, receive a cash payment 10% 12% 8% 8% 7% 14% 9% 12% 12% 9% 8%
    No, don’t receive either. 60% 56% 64% 52% 64% 64% 72% 64% 61% 53% 52%
    Not sure 14% 12% 16% 22% 14% 7% 15% 15% 10% 19% 10%

     26% said they either received a tax deduction or a cash refund for their franking credits.

    Those most likely to receive a tax deduction were incomes over $2,000pw (29%), full-time workers (23%) and university educated (24%).

    Those most likely to receive a cash payment were aged 65+ (22%).

  • Mar, 2018

    Support for ending cash refunds for imputation credits

    The Labor Party has proposed to end the cash refunds for imputation credits. Taxpayers will still be able to claim a tax deduction. Do you support or oppose ending the cash refunds?

      Total   Vote Labor Vote Lib/Nat Vote Greens Vote Other   Men Women Aged 18-34 Aged 35-54 Aged 55+
    Total support 32%   48% 24% 46% 23%   40% 24% 41% 27% 30%
    Total oppose 30%   17% 47% 17% 32%   33% 27% 17% 28% 46%
    Strongly support 10% 18% 4% 15% 7% 16% 4% 11% 10% 10%
    Support 22% 30% 20% 31% 16% 24% 20% 30% 17% 20%
    Oppose 14% 10% 20% 12% 11% 13% 15% 11% 14% 16%
    Strongly oppose 16% 7% 27% 5% 21% 20% 12% 6% 14% 30%
    Don’t know 37% 34% 29% 38% 45% 26% 48% 42% 45% 24%

     

      Total   Less than $600

    pw

    $600-1,000 pw $1,000-1,500 pw $1,500-2,000 pw More than $2,000 pw   Know a lot/fair amount Know a little Receive tax de-duction Receive cash back Receive neither
    Total support 32%   33% 35% 29% 30% 41%   44% 39% 40% 25% 35%
    Total oppose 30%   27% 30% 32% 33% 32%   48% 42% 48% 65% 23%
    Strongly support 10% 13% 13% 7% 7% 12% 17% 11% 17% 4% 11%
    Support 22% 20% 22% 22% 23% 29% 27% 28% 23% 21% 24%
    Oppose 14% 11% 16% 15% 11% 15% 11% 23% 17% 23% 12%
    Strongly oppose 16% 16% 14% 17% 22% 17% 37% 19% 31% 42% 11%
    Don’t know 37% 40% 35% 39% 38% 27% 8% 19% 12% 9% 42%

     

    32% support ending cash refunds for imputation credits and 30% were opposed. 37% did not give an opinion.

    Those most likely to support ending cash refunds were Labor voters (48%), Greens voters (46%), aged 18-34 (41%) and incomes over $2,000pw (41%).

    Those most likely to oppose ending cash refunds were Liberal-National voters (47%) and aged 65+ (57%).

     

  • Mar, 2018

    Statements about imputation credits

    Do you agree or disagree with the following statements?

      Total agree Total disagree   Strongly agree Agree Disagree Strongly disagree Don’t know
    Paying people money to compensate for tax they haven’t paid does not make sense 68% 16%   28% 40% 12% 4% 15%
    The $6 billion per year spend on these tax credits would be better used funding spending on schools and hospitals 65% 20% 30% 35% 14% 6% 15%
    The $6 billion per year spend on these cash refunds would be better used to stop the pension age from being increased to seventy 60% 23% 27% 33% 16% 7% 18%
    Pensioners who own shares should not receive more in government payments than those who do not own shares 54% 30% 18% 36% 22% 8% 17%
    The $6 billion per year spend on these tax credits would be better used to cut the budget deficit 53% 27% 16% 37% 20% 7% 20%
    The vast majority of people receiving money to compensate for tax are wealthy 52% 26%   20% 32% 16% 10% 22%
    The $6 billion per year spend on these tax credits would be better used funding income tax cuts 49% 27% 16% 33% 20% 7% 23%
    Retirees receiving cash refunds should not have their payments reduced, no matter how wealthy they are 48% 32% 15% 33% 24% 8% 20%
    The issue of dividend

    imputation is too complex for me to form an opinion

    40% 41% 8% 32% 30% 11% 18%

    40% agreed that the issue of dividend imputation is too complex for me to form an opinion.

    Despite this, around 80% gave an opinion on each statement.

    There was strongest agreement with the statements –

    • Paying people money to compensate for tax they haven’t paid does not make sense (68% agree)
    • The $6 billion per year spend on these tax credits would be better used funding spending on schools and hospitals (64%)
    • The $6 billion per year spend on these cash refunds would be better used to stop the pension age from being increased to seventy (60%)

    And while 54% agreed that “Pensioners who own shares should not receive more in government payments than those who do not own shares”, 48% agreed that “Retirees receiving cash refunds should not have their payments reduced, no matter how wealthy they are”.

    A majority (52%) agreed that “The vast majority of people receiving money to compensate for tax are wealthy “.

    Those who claimed to have more knowledge about dividend imputation were much more likely to think “Retirees receiving cash refunds should not have their payments reduced, no matter how wealthy they are” (60%) and more likely to disagree that the money would be better used funding schools and hospitals (40% disagree), stopping the pension age from being increased to seventy (42%), cutting the budget deficit (45%) and funding income tax cuts (50%).

      Total agree Total disagree   Know a lot/fair amount

    agree

    Know a lot/fair amount

    disagree

      Know a little

    agree

    Know a little

    disagree

    Paying people money to compensate for tax they haven’t paid does not make sense 68% 16%   60% 34% 65% 23%
    The $6 billion per year spend on these tax credits would be better used funding spending on schools and hospitals 65% 20% 51% 40% 60% 28%
    The $6 billion per year spend on these cash refunds would be better used to stop the pension age from being increased to seventy 60% 23% 49% 42% 57% 30%
    Pensioners who own shares should not receive more in government payments than those who do not own shares 54% 30% 53% 42% 55% 37%
    The $6 billion per year spend on these tax credits would be better used to cut the budget deficit 53% 27% 45% 45% 54% 33%
    The vast majority of people receiving money to compensate for tax are wealthy 52% 26%   48% 48% 52% `31%
    The $6 billion per year spend on these tax credits would be better used funding income tax cuts 49% 27% 43% 50% 52% 32%
    Retirees receiving cash refunds should not have their payments reduced, no matter how wealthy they are 48% 32% 60% 33% 50% 41%
    The issue of dividend imputation is too complex for me to form an opinion 40% 41% 28% 66% 30% 59%
  • Mar, 2018

    Support for tax measures

    Would you support or oppose the following tax measures?

      Total support Total oppose   Strongly support Support Oppose Strongly oppose Don’t know
    Making multi-national corporations pay their fair share of tax 84% 5% 59% 25% 4% 1% 11%
    Stopping people with family trusts from splitting their income to avoid tax 58% 20%   20% 38% 15% 5% 22%
    Capping the maximum tax deduction for managing tax affairs, such as payments to lawyers or accountants, at no more than $4,000 for individuals 53% 17% 17% 36% 13% 4% 31%
    Limiting negative gearing to investments in newly built properties and halving the capital gains tax concession 46% 24%   17% 29% 17% 7% 31%
    Cutting the company tax rate to 25% 40% 30% 11% 29% 20% 10% 31%
    Limiting the amount of tax-free superannuation contributions individuals can make 34% 42%   10% 24% 28% 14% 25%
    Cutting the tax rate for the top income tax bracket while the budget is still in deficit 28% 50% 9% 19% 27% 23% 24%
    Increasing the tax rate for workers earning under $87,000 a year 19% 65% 6% 13% 28% 37% 16%

    Tax measures with majority support were –

    • Making multi-national corporations pay their fair share of tax (84% support)
    • Stopping people with family trusts from splitting their income to avoid tax (58%)
    • Capping the maximum tax deduction for managing tax affairs, such as payments to lawyers or accountants, at no more than $4,000 for individuals (53%)

    Tax measures with majority opposition were –

    • Increasing the tax rate for workers earning under $87,000 a year (65% oppose)
    • Cutting the tax rate for the top income tax bracket while the budget is still in deficit (50%)

    Cutting the company tax rate to 25% had 40% support and 30% opposed.

  • Mar, 2018

    Party trust

    Who do you trust most to manage a fair tax system?

     

      Total   Vote Labor Vote Lib/Nat Vote Greens Vote Other
    Labor 26% 63% 4% 38% 12%
    Liberal-National 28% 2% 66% 4% 21%
    No difference 31% 20% 21% 42% 58%
    Don’t know 15% 15% 95 16% 9%

     

    There was little difference in between the parties in terms of who would be most trusted to manage a fair tax system.

    28% favoured the Liberal National parties, 26% Labor and 31% said their was no difference.

    53% of over 65’s said they would trust Liberal-National most.

Error: