2050, agriculture, climate change, net-zero emissions
Q. The deputy PM Michael McCormack says agriculture could be excluded from the new 2050 net zero emissions target because regional Australia is still recovering from drought, bushfires, flood and the Covid-19 pandemic, and this target will “…hurt regional Australia”.
To what extent do you support or oppose this proposition to exclude agriculture from the new 2050 net zero emissions target?
Total | Federal Voting Intention | ||||
Labor | TOTAL: Coalition | Greens | TOTAL: Other | ||
Strongly support | 17% | 10% | 26% | 8% | 22% |
Somewhat support | 27% | 31% | 29% | 21% | 17% |
Somewhat oppose | 17% | 19% | 15% | 18% | 17% |
Strongly oppose | 15% | 16% | 10% | 30% | 20% |
Unsure | 24% | 24% | 20% | 22% | 23% |
TOTAL: Support | 44% | 41% | 55% | 29% | 39% |
TOTAL: Oppose | 32% | 35% | 25% | 48% | 37% |
Base (n) | 1,109 | 359 | 428 | 101 | 131 |
climate, climate change, emissions, Greenhouse gases, net-zero emissions, Pollution
Q. To what extent would you support or oppose setting a zero-carbon pollution target for 2050 if it were adopted by the Federal Government?
Federal Voting Intention (Lower House) | Jan’20 | |||||
Total | Labor | Coalition | Greens | NET: Other | ||
Strongly support | 31% | 38% | 22% | 59% | 19% | 32% |
Somewhat support | 44% | 42% | 46% | 33% | 44% | 39% |
Somewhat oppose | 15% | 13% | 17% | 6% | 17% | 18% |
Strongly oppose | 11% | 7% | 15% | 2% | 20% | 12% |
NET: Support | 75% | 80% | 68% | 91% | 63% | 71% |
NET: Oppose | 25% | 20% | 32% | 9% | 37% | 29% |
Base (n) | 1,090 | 336 | 390 | 104 | 146 | 1,080 |