Q6. How would you rate the Federal Government’s performance in handling the following issues?
Total good | Total poor | Very good | Good | Poor | Very poor | Not sure | |
Stimulating the economy to address the economic crisis | 63% | 29% | 21% | 42% | 19% | 10% | 8% |
Handling the economy in such a way as to minimize job losses during the recent economic crisis | 59% | 29% | 15% | 44% | 18% | 11% | 12% |
Trying to find ways to improve the health care system | 50% | 39% | 10% | 39% | 24% | 15% | 12% |
Replacing the Workchoices industrial laws | 44% | 36% | 13% | 31% | 22% | 14% | 20% |
Standing up for Australian working families | 43% | 45% | 9% | 34% | 24% | 21% | 13% |
Balancing the interests of business and Australian workers | 39% | 43% | 5% | 34% | 25% | 18% | 18% |
The school buildings program | 31% | 56% | 5% | 25% | 29% | 27% | 14% |
Introducing an emissions trading scheme | 28% | 57% | 3% | 25% | 28% | 29% | 15% |
Handling the issue of asylum seekers | 18% | 72% | 3% | 15% | 28% | 43% | 10% |
A majority of respondents rated the Government’s performance good or very good for “Stimulating the economy to address the economic crisis” (63%), “Handling the economy in such a way as to minimize job losses during the recent economic crisis” (59%) and “Trying to find ways to improve the health care system” (50%).
A majority rated the Government’s performance poor or very poor for “Handling the issue of asylum seekers” (72%), “Introducing an emissions trading scheme” (57%) and “The school buildings program” (56%).
The only issue on which less than half Labor voters rated the Government performance as good/very good was “Handling the issue of asylum seekers” (34% good/58% poor).