The Essential Report Archive Read the latest report

  • Apr, 2017

    Permanent residency changes

    Q. Under the 457 visa system, visa holders could be eligible for permanent residency after 2 years. Under the new visa system, those on 4-year visas with high level skills will be eligible for permanent residency after 3 years. Do you approve or disapprove of allowing workers on visas to apply for permanent residency? 

      Total   Vote Labor Vote Lib/Nat Vote Greens Vote other
    Total approve 59%   60% 68% 65% 48%
    Total disapprove 23%   23% 21% 16% 35%
    Strongly approve 13%   17% 13% 18% 5%
    Approve 46%   43% 55% 47% 43%
    Disapprove 13%   13% 14% 10% 16%
    Strongly disapprove 10%   10% 7% 6% 19%
    Don’t know 18%   16% 11% 20% 17%

     

    59% approve of allowing workers on visas to apply for permanent residency, and 23% disapprove.

    Those most likely to approve were Liberal/National voters (68%) and those aged 18-24 (66%).

    Those most likely to disapprove were those aged 65+ (36%) other party/independent voters (35%).

  • Apr, 2017

    Permanent residency probationary visa

    Q. Do you agree or disagree that people applying for permanent residency in Australia should be first put on a probationary visa before being granted citizenship?

      Total   Vote Labor Vote Lib/Nat Vote Greens Vote other
    Total agree 78%   79% 84% 62% 87%
    Total disagree 10%   10% 9% 22% 6%
    Strongly agree 37%   34% 43% 22% 51%
    Agree 41%   45% 41% 40% 36%
    Disagree 6%   7% 7% 11% 1%
    Strongly disagree 4%   3% 2% 11% 5%
    Don’t know 12%   11% 8% 16% 7%

     

    78% agree with putting people applying for permanent residency on a probationary visa, and 10% disagree.

    Those most likely to agree were those aged 65+ (89%), those voting other party/independent (87%) and those voting Liberal/National (84%).

    Those most likely to disagree were those voting Greens (27%) and those aged 25-34 (17%).

  • Apr, 2017

    Tony Abbott

    Q. Do you think Tony Abbott should –

      Total   Vote Labor Vote Lib/Nat Vote Greens Vote other   Aug 2016
    Stay in Parliament on the backbench 17%   17% 22% 10% 20%   21%
    Stay in Parliament and be given a Ministry 17%   8% 27% 14% 21%   25%
    Resign from Parliament 40%   54% 31% 57% 32%   37%
    Don’t know 26%   21% 20% 18% 26%   17%

     

    40% think that Tony Abbott should resign from parliament, a slight increase from 37% when this question was last asked in August 2016.

    Those most likely to think that Tony Abbott should resign were those voting Greens (57%) and Labor (54%), and South Australians (54%).

    49% of Liberal/National voters think that Tony Abbott should stay in parliament, whether in the ministry or on the backbench, while 31% think that he should resign.

  • Apr, 2017

    Government responsibilities

    Q. Which of the following should be mainly the responsibility of the Federal Government and which should be mainly the responsibility of the State Governments – or should they have equal responsibility?

      Mainly Federal Mainly State Both

    equally

    Don’t know
    Constructing new roads and highways 17% 29% 44% 10%
    Investing in public transport 10% 45% 36% 8%
    Improving the health system 36% 11% 47% 7%
    Improving the education system 30% 14% 48% 7%
    Managing mining projects and mining profits 35% 19% 34% 11%
    Investing in regional areas 16% 33% 42% 8%
    Managing the environment 28% 11% 53% 8%
    Managing our water resources 21% 18% 52% 8%
    Addressing climate change 35% 6% 48% 11%
    Industrial relations issues 36% 14% 40% 10%
    Reliable and affordable electricity and gas supply 27% 17% 48% 8%
    Housing affordability 25% 18% 49% 9%

    45% think that investing in public transport is mainly the responsibility of state governments, and 35% think that managing mining projects and mining profits is mainly the responsibility of the federal government. For all other responsibilities, the largest proportion think that responsibility should be shared equally between state and federal government.

  • Apr, 2017

    Voting behaviour

    Q. Thinking about your voting in Federal and State elections, which of the following parties have you voted for over the last 10 years?

      Total   Liberal Nation-al Labor Greens One Nation PUP Nick Xeno-phon Team Family First Other party Indep-endent
    Liberal or National Party 48%   100% 27% 26% 52% 61% 53% 44% 37% 47%
    Labor Party 47%   26% 100% 58% 43% 52% 55% 49% 60% 57%
    The Greens 18%   10% 22% 100% 16% 21% 30% 43% 33% 32%
    Pauline Hanson’s One Nation 8%   9% 8% 7% 100% 47% 6% 13% 20% 14%
    Palmer United Party 1%   2% 1% 2% 7% 100% 4% 9% 6% 3%
    Nick Xenophon Team 5%   5% 5% 8% 3% 15% 100% 27% 5% 10%
    Family First 3%   3% 3% 8% 5% 22% 19% 100% 7% 7%
    Some other minor party 3%   3% 4% 6% 8% 17% 4% 7% 100% 12%
    An independent 11%   11% 13% 19% 19% 22% 24% 23% 39% 100%
    Not sure 7%  

     

    48% of voters said they had voted Liberal/National in the past 10 years, 47% have voted Labor and 18% for the Greens.

    13% of voters have voted for both Labor and Liberal/National in last 10 years.

    29% have only voted Liberal/National, 23% have only voted Labor and 5% have only voted Greens

  • Apr, 2017

    Federal voting intention

    Q. If a Federal Election was held today to which party will you probably give your first preference vote? If not sure, which party are you currently leaning toward? If don’t know – Well which party are you currently leaning to?

      Total   Last week 11/4/17 2 weeks ago 4/4/17 4 weeks ago 21/3/17   Election 2 Jul 16
    Liberal 33%   35% 35% 31%    
    National 3%   3% 2% 3%    
    Total Liberal/National 36%   37% 37% 34%   42.0%
    Labor 37%   36% 36% 37%   34.7%
    Greens 10%   10% 10% 9%   10.2%
    Nick Xenophon Team 3%   3% 3% 3%    
    Pauline Hanson’s One Nation 8%   8% 8% 10%    
    Other/Independent 7%   6% 6% 6%   13.1%
    2 party preferred              
    Liberal National 46%   47% 47% 45%   50.4%
    Labor 54%   53% 53% 55%   49.6%

     

    1. Sample = 1,804. The data in the above tables comprise 2-week averages derived from the first preference/leaning to voting questions. Respondents who select ‘don’t know’ are not included in the results. The two-party preferred estimate is calculated by distributing the votes of the other parties according to their preferences at the 2016 election.
  • Apr, 2017

    Approval of bombing Syria

    Q. Do you approve or disapprove of the US bombing of Syria in response to the Syrian Governments reported use of chemical weapons which killed civilians?

      Total   Vote Labor Vote Lib/Nat Vote Greens Vote other
    Total approve 41%   41% 55% 16% 41%
    Total disapprove 36%   38% 26% 63% 39%
    Strongly approve 14%   14% 20% 1% 15%
    Approve 27%   27% 35% 15% 26%
    Disapprove 21%   22% 16% 36% 21%
    Strongly disapprove 15%   16% 10% 27% 18%
    Don’t know 23%   21% 20% 20% 19%

     

    41% approve of the US bombing of Syria and 36% disapprove.

    Those most likely to approve were Liberal/National voters (55%), men (50%) and aged 65+ (58%).

    Those most likely to disapprove were Greens voters (63%) and aged 18-34 (43%).

  • Apr, 2017

    Approval of sending troops into Syria

    Q. Would you approve or disapprove of the US sending ground troops into Syria?

      Total   Vote Labor Vote Lib/Nat Vote Greens Vote other
    Total approve 37%   41% 45% 14% 36%
    Total disapprove 39%   38% 31% 69% 44%
    Strongly approve 11%   14% 13% 10%
    Approve 26%   27% 32% 14% 26%
    Disapprove 25%   25% 20% 40% 27%
    Strongly disapprove 14%   13% 11% 29% 17%
    Don’t know 24%   21% 24% 16% 20%

     

    37% would approve of the US sending ground troops into Syria and 39% would disapprove.

    Those most likely to approve were Liberal/National voters (45%) and men (42%).

    Those most likely to disapprove were Greens voters (63%) and university educated (45%).

Error: