Performance of the Greens
Q. Do you think the performance of the Greens in Federal Parliament has been good or poor?
|
Total |
Vote Labor |
Vote Lib/Nat |
Vote Greens |
|
| Total good |
17% |
21% |
7% |
71% |
| Total poor |
47% |
37% |
65% |
4% |
| Very good |
3% |
4% |
* |
18% |
| Good |
14% |
17% |
7% |
53% |
| Neither good nor poor |
27% |
35% |
21% |
21% |
| Poor |
19% |
22% |
21% |
1% |
| Very poor |
28% |
15% |
44% |
3% |
| Don’t know |
10% |
7% |
7% |
4% |
17% think the performance of The Greens in Federal Parliament has been good or very good and 47% think it has been poor or very poor.
Labor voters tend to think The Greens’ performance has been poor/very poor (37%) or neither good nor poor (35%) – and only 21% think it has been good/very good.
Among respondents aged under 35, 24% think The Greens’ performance has been good/very good and 29% think it has been poor/very poor.
Essential Report
Two Party Preferred: 20 May 2013
In this week's report:
3Q: Latest episodes
-
Essential Report with EMC’s Peter Lewis and Jackie Woods
Comments19 Sep 2012Lewis and Woods talk through this week’s polling numbers: voting intention, leader attributes, drug laws in Australia, and more…
-
Are we ready for the grey revolution?
Comments12 Sep 2012Ken Morrison says our cities need to be transformed for our ageing population – and it’s not solely about nursing homes.
-
Ships, trains and submarines — can we build them here?
Comments11 Sep 2012Tim Ayres wishes Clive Palmer and other mining giants would give local manufacturers a go instead of heading overseas.
-
Do we undervalue our public sector innovations?
Comments11 Sep 2012Nadine Flood questions whether governments take our science and other publicly funded breakthroughs for granted.
Essential Tags
Recent Comments
- Workers Care About Kids At Risk on Would You Ask Your Grandmother To Live On $35 A Day?
- Morgan on Federal politics – voting intention
- Krusha on Time for Activities
- Jonathan Tasini on We Can’t Eat Austerity
- Clarkejeremy3 on We Can’t Eat Austerity
